Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36679610›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Using Whale Optimization Algorithm and Haze Level Information in a Model-Based Image Dehazing Algorithm.

Cheng-Hsiung Hsieh, Ze-Yu Chen, Yi-Hung Chang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Cheng-Hsiung HsiehDepartment of Computer Science and Information Engineering, Chaoyang University of Technology, No. 168, Jifong E. Rd., Taichung 413, Taiwan.
Ze-Yu ChenDepartment of Computer Science and Information Engineering, Chaoyang University of Technology, No. 168, Jifong E. Rd., Taichung 413, Taiwan.
Yi-Hung ChangMacronix International Co., No. 19, Lihsin Rd., Science Park, Hsinchu 300, Taiwan.

Funding

Ministry of Science and Technology of the Republic of China MOST 110-2221-E-324-012
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Single image dehazing has been a challenge in the field of image restoration and computer vision. Many model-based and non-model-based dehazing methods have been reported. This study focuses on a model-based algorithm. A popular model-based method is dark channel prior (DCP) which has attracted a lot of attention because of its simplicity and effectiveness. In DCP-based methods, the model parameters should be appropriately estimated for better performance. Previously, we found that appropriate scaling factors of model parameters helped dehazing performance and proposed an improved DCP (IDCP) method that uses heuristic scaling factors for the model parameters (atmospheric light and initial transmittance). With the IDCP, this paper presents an approach to find optimal scaling factors using the whale optimization algorithm (WOA) and haze level information. The WOA uses ground truth images as a reference in a fitness function to search the optimal scaling factors in the IDCP. The IDCP with the WOA was termed IDCP/WOA. It was observed that the performance of IDCP/WOA was significantly affected by hazy ground truth images. Thus, according to the haze level information, a hazy image discriminator was developed to exclude hazy ground truth images from the dataset used in the IDCP/WOA. To avoid using ground truth images in the application stage, hazy image clustering was presented to group hazy images and their corresponding optimal scaling factors obtained by the IDCP/WOA. Then, the average scaling factors for each haze level were found. The resulting dehazing algorithm was called optimized IDCP (OIDCP). Three datasets commonly used in the image dehazing field, the RESIDE, O-HAZE, and KeDeMa datasets, were used to justify the proposed OIDCP. Then a comparison was made between the OIDCP and five recent haze removal methods. On the RESIDE dataset, the OIDCP achieved a PSNR of 26.23 dB, which was better than IDCP by 0.81 dB, DCP by 8.03 dB, RRO by 5.28, AOD by 5.6 dB, and GCAN by 1.27 dB. On the O-HAZE dataset, the OIDCP had a PSNR of 19.53 dB, which was better than IDCP by 0.06 dB, DCP by 4.39 dB, RRO by 0.97 dB, AOD by 1.41 dB, and GCAN by 0.34 dB. On the KeDeMa dataset, the OIDCP obtained the best overall performance and gave dehazed images with stable visual quality. This suggests that the results of this study may benefit model-based dehazing algorithms.

Indexed as

dark channel priorhaze level informationhazy image clusteringhazy image discriminatormodel-based image dehazing algorithmwhale optimization algorithm

Identifiers

PMID36679610
PMCPMC9861576

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.