ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2023
Absolute IOP/EOP Estimation Models without Initial Information of Various Smart City Sensors.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A new method with C-means segmentation for non-uniform image coordinate system definition in panoramic imaging employing Ladybug2 camera.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Coarse Alignment Methodology of Point Cloud Based on Camera Position/Orientation Estimation Model.Journal of imaging · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In smart cities, a large amount of optical camera equipment is deployed and used. Closed-circuit television (CCTV), unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs), and smartphones are some examples of such equipment. However, additional information about these devices, such as 3D position, orientation information, and principal distance, is not provided. To solve this problem, the structured mobile mapping system point cloud was used in this study to investigate methods of estimating the principal point, position, and orientation of optical sensors without initial given values. The principal distance was calculated using two direct linear transformation (DLT) models and a perspective projection model. Methods for estimating position and orientation were discussed, and their stability was tested using real-world sensors. When the perspective projection model was used, the camera position and orientation were best estimated. The original DLT model had a significant error in the orientation estimation. The correlation between the DLT model parameters was thought to have influenced the estimation result. When the perspective projection model was used, the position and orientation errors were 0.80 m and 2.55°, respectively. However, when using a fixed-wing UAV, the estimated result was not properly produced owing to ground control point placement problems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.