Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36679494›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Internet-of-Things-Enabled Markerless Running Gait Assessment from a Single Smartphone Camera.

Fraser Young, Rachel Mason, Rosie Morris, Samuel Stuart, Alan Godfrey

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Fraser YoungDepartment of Computer and Information Sciences, Northumbria University, Newcastle-upon-Tyne NE1 8ST, UK.
Rachel MasonDepartment of Health and Life Sciences, Northumbria University, Newcastle-upon-Tyne NE1 8ST, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5087-1969
Rosie MorrisDepartment of Health and Life Sciences, Northumbria University, Newcastle-upon-Tyne NE1 8ST, UK.
Samuel StuartDepartment of Health and Life Sciences, Northumbria University, Newcastle-upon-Tyne NE1 8ST, UK.
Alan GodfreyDepartment of Computer and Information Sciences, Northumbria University, Newcastle-upon-Tyne NE1 8ST, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4049-9291

Funding

DANU Sports n/aEuropean Regional Development Fund Intensive Industrial Innovation Programme 25R17P01847Northumbria University n/aParkinson's Foundation PF-CRA-2073Parkinson's Foundation PF-FBS-1898
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Running gait assessment is essential for the development of technical optimization strategies as well as to inform injury prevention and rehabilitation. Currently, running gait assessment relies on (i) visual assessment, exhibiting subjectivity and limited reliability, or (ii) use of instrumented approaches, which often carry high costs and can be intrusive due to the attachment of equipment to the body. Here, the use of an IoT-enabled markerless computer vision smartphone application based upon Google’s pose estimation model BlazePose was evaluated for running gait assessment for use in low-resource settings. That human pose estimation architecture was used to extract contact time, swing time, step time, knee flexion angle, and foot strike location from a large cohort of runners. The gold-standard Vicon 3D motion capture system was used as a reference. The proposed approach performs robustly, demonstrating good (ICC(2,1) > 0.75) to excellent (ICC(2,1) > 0.90) agreement in all running gait outcomes. Additionally, temporal outcomes exhibit low mean error (0.01−0.014 s) in left foot outcomes. However, there are some discrepancies in right foot outcomes, due to occlusion. This study demonstrates that the proposed low-cost and markerless system provides accurate running gait assessment outcomes. The approach may help routine running gait assessment in low-resource environments.

Indexed as

RunningSmartphoneBiomechanical PhenomenaGaitHumansInternetReproducibility of ResultsBlazePosecomputer visiondeep learninggait analysispose estimationsignal analysissmartphone application

Identifiers

PMID36679494
PMCPMC9866353

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.