Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36679464›Full record

ReviewSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Applications of Electronic Nose, Electronic Eye and Electronic Tongue in Quality, Safety and Shelf Life of Meat and Meat Products: A Review.

Paulo E S Munekata, Sarah Finardi, Carolina Krebs de Souza, Caroline Meinert, Mirian Pateiro, Tuany Gabriela Hoffmann, Rubén Domínguez, Sávio Leandro Bertoli, Manoj Kumar, José M Lorenzo

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Strategies for replacing phosphates in meat processing.Food science of animal resources · 2026
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Valorization ofFrontiers in nutrition · 2026
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Paulo E S MunekataCentro Tecnológico de la Carne de Galicia, Rúa Galicia N° 4, Parque Tecnológico de Galicia, San Cibrao das Viñas, 32900 Ourense, Spain.
Sarah FinardiFood Preservation & Innovation Laboratory, Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Blumenau, 3250 São Paulo St., Blumenau 89030-000, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-1386-9026
Carolina Krebs de SouzaFood Preservation & Innovation Laboratory, Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Blumenau, 3250 São Paulo St., Blumenau 89030-000, Brazil.
Caroline MeinertFood Preservation & Innovation Laboratory, Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Blumenau, 3250 São Paulo St., Blumenau 89030-000, Brazil.
Mirian PateiroCentro Tecnológico de la Carne de Galicia, Rúa Galicia N° 4, Parque Tecnológico de Galicia, San Cibrao das Viñas, 32900 Ourense, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-9682-4594
Tuany Gabriela HoffmannFood Preservation & Innovation Laboratory, Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Blumenau, 3250 São Paulo St., Blumenau 89030-000, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-8216-5359
Rubén DomínguezCentro Tecnológico de la Carne de Galicia, Rúa Galicia N° 4, Parque Tecnológico de Galicia, San Cibrao das Viñas, 32900 Ourense, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-2764-504X
Sávio Leandro BertoliFood Preservation & Innovation Laboratory, Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Blumenau, 3250 São Paulo St., Blumenau 89030-000, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-6351-4020
Manoj KumarChemical and Biochemical Processing Division, ICAR-Central Institute for Research on Cotton Technology, Mumbai 400019, India.ORCID 0000-0002-4192-6497
José M LorenzoCentro Tecnológico de la Carne de Galicia, Rúa Galicia N° 4, Parque Tecnológico de Galicia, San Cibrao das Viñas, 32900 Ourense, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-7725-9294

Funding

Axencia Galega de Innovacion IN607A2019/01Ministry of Science and Innovation (MCIN, Spain) IJC2020-043358-IMinistry of Science, Technology, Innovation and Communications and National Council for Scientific and Technological Development - CNPQ CNPq / MAI-DAI CP n. 12/2020
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The quality and shelf life of meat and meat products are key factors that are usually evaluated by complex and laborious protocols and intricate sensory methods. Devices with attractive characteristics (fast reading, portability, and relatively low operational costs) that facilitate the measurement of meat and meat products characteristics are of great value. This review aims to provide an overview of the fundamentals of electronic nose (E-nose), eye (E-eye), and tongue (E-tongue), data preprocessing, chemometrics, the application in the evaluation of quality and shelf life of meat and meat products, and advantages and disadvantages related to these electronic systems. E-nose is the most versatile technology among all three electronic systems and comprises applications to distinguish the application of different preservation methods (chilling vs. frozen, for instance), processing conditions (especially temperature and time), detect adulteration (meat from different species), and the monitoring of shelf life. Emerging applications include the detection of pathogenic microorganisms using E-nose. E-tongue is another relevant technology to determine adulteration, processing conditions, and to monitor shelf life. Finally, E-eye has been providing accurate measuring of color evaluation and grade marbling levels in fresh meat. However, advances are necessary to obtain information that are more related to industrial conditions. Advances to include industrial scenarios (cut sorting in continuous processing, for instance) are of great value.

Indexed as

Meat ProductsCell MovementElectronic NoseMeatTechnologyadulterationpreservationprocessingquality controlsafetyshelf life

Identifiers

PMID36679464
PMCPMC9860605

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.