Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36679430›Full record

ReviewSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Survey of Explainable AI Techniques in Healthcare.

Ahmad Chaddad, Jihao Peng, Jian Xu, Ahmed Bouridane

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 138 papers, 13 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
138citing papers in PubMed, 13 pooled it
84.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

138 citing papers in PubMed, 13 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 488 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. Pooled it
  13. Pooled it
  14. Cross-cohort Generalization for Heart Disease Prediction with Explainable AI.Journal of cardiovascular translational research · 2026
    Article
  15. Explainability in context: calibrating appropriate trust and reliance in artificial intelligence.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2026
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

78 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Ahmad ChaddadSchool of Artificial Intelligence, Guilin University of Electronic Technology, Jinji Road, Guilin 541004, China.ORCID 0000-0003-3402-9576
Jihao PengSchool of Artificial Intelligence, Guilin University of Electronic Technology, Jinji Road, Guilin 541004, China.
Jian XuSchool of Artificial Intelligence, Guilin University of Electronic Technology, Jinji Road, Guilin 541004, China.
Ahmed BouridaneCentre for Data Analytics and Cybersecurity, University of Sharjah, Sharjah 27272, United Arab Emirates.ORCID 0000-0002-1474-2772
Guilin University of Electronic Technology · CNUniversity of Sharjah · AE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) with deep learning models has been widely applied in numerous domains, including medical imaging and healthcare tasks. In the medical field, any judgment or decision is fraught with risk. A doctor will carefully judge whether a patient is sick before forming a reasonable explanation based on the patient's symptoms and/or an examination. Therefore, to be a viable and accepted tool, AI needs to mimic human judgment and interpretation skills. Specifically, explainable AI (XAI) aims to explain the information behind the black-box model of deep learning that reveals how the decisions are made. This paper provides a survey of the most recent XAI techniques used in healthcare and related medical imaging applications. We summarize and categorize the XAI types, and highlight the algorithms used to increase interpretability in medical imaging topics. In addition, we focus on the challenging XAI problems in medical applications and provide guidelines to develop better interpretations of deep learning models using XAI concepts in medical image and text analysis. Furthermore, this survey provides future directions to guide developers and researchers for future prospective investigations on clinical topics, particularly on applications with medical imaging.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligencePhysiciansAlgorithmsHumansJudgmentResearch Personneldeep learningexplainable AImedical imagingradiomics

Identifiers

PMID36679430
PMCPMC9862413
OpenAlexW4313648826

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.