Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36679406›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2023

An Insight into the Machine-Learning-Based Fileless Malware Detection.

Osama Khalid, Subhan Ullah, Tahir Ahmad, Saqib Saeed, Dina A Alabbad, Mudassar Aslam, Attaullah Buriro, Rizwan Ahmad

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Osama KhalidFAST School of Computing, National University of Computer and Emerging Sciences (NUCES-FAST), Islamabad 44000, Pakistan.ORCID 0000-0001-7979-0620
Subhan UllahFAST School of Computing, National University of Computer and Emerging Sciences (NUCES-FAST), Islamabad 44000, Pakistan.ORCID 0000-0002-3925-621X
Tahir AhmadCenter for Cybersecurity, Brunno Kessler Foundation, 38123 Trento, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-8105-6791
Saqib SaeedSAUDI ARAMCO Cybersecurity Chair, Department of Computer Information Systems, College of Computer Science and Information Technology, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, P.O. Box 1982, Dammam 31441, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0001-7136-3480
Dina A AlabbadSAUDI ARAMCO Cybersecurity Chair, Department of Computer Engineering, College of Computer Science and Information Technology, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, P.O. Box 1982, Dammam 31441, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0001-7624-8924
Mudassar AslamFAST School of Computing, National University of Computer and Emerging Sciences (NUCES-FAST), Islamabad 44000, Pakistan.ORCID 0000-0003-3223-4234
Attaullah BuriroFaculty of Computer Science, Free University Bozen-Bolzano, 39100 Bolzano, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2723-2410
Rizwan AhmadSchool of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, National University of Sciences and Technology (NUST), Islamabad 44000, Pakistan.ORCID 0000-0002-4758-7895

Funding

SAUDI ARAMCO Cybersecurity Chair, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Saudi Arabia xxx
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In recent years, massive development in the malware industry changed the entire landscape for malware development. Therefore, cybercriminals became more sophisticated by advancing their development techniques from file-based to fileless malware. As file-based malware depends on files to spread itself, on the other hand, fileless malware does not require a traditional file system and uses benign processes to carry out its malicious intent. Therefore, it evades conventional detection techniques and remains stealthy. This paper briefly explains fileless malware, its life cycle, and its infection chain. Moreover, it proposes a detection technique based on feature analysis using machine learning for fileless malware detection. The virtual machine acquired the memory dumps upon executing the malicious and non-malicious samples. Then the necessary features are extracted using the Volatility memory forensics tool, which is then analyzed using machine learning classification algorithms. After that, the best algorithm is selected based on the k-fold cross-validation score. Experimental evaluation has shown that Random Forest outperforms other machine learning classifiers (Decision Tree, Support Vector Machine, Logistic Regression, K-Nearest Neighbor, XGBoost, and Gradient Boosting). It achieved an overall accuracy of 93.33% with a True Positive Rate (TPR) of 87.5% at zeroFalse Positive Rate (FPR) for fileless malware collected from five widely used datasets (VirusShare, AnyRun, PolySwarm, HatchingTriage, and JoESadbox).

Indexed as

AlgorithmsMachine LearningLogistic ModelsRandom ForestSupport Vector Machinecybercrimesfilelss malwaremachine learningmalwarememory forensicsvolatility

Identifiers

PMID36679406
PMCPMC9861630

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.