Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36679401›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Exploration of Effective Time-Velocity Distribution for Doppler-Radar-Based Personal Gait Identification Using Deep Learning.

Keitaro Shioiri, Kenshi Saho

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Keitaro ShioiriDepartment of Intelligent Robotics, Toyama Prefectural University, Imizu 939-0398, Japan.
Kenshi SahoDepartment of Intelligent Robotics, Toyama Prefectural University, Imizu 939-0398, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-2088-1231

Funding

Telecommunication Advancement Foundation R2
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Personal identification based on radar gait measurement is an important application of biometric technology because it enables remote and continuous identification of people, irrespective of the lighting conditions and subjects' outfits. This study explores an effective time-velocity distribution and its relevant parameters for Doppler-radar-based personal gait identification using deep learning. Most conventional studies on radar-based gait identification used a short-time Fourier transform (STFT), which is a general method to obtain time-velocity distribution for motion recognition using Doppler radar. However, the length of the window function that controls the time and velocity resolutions of the time-velocity image was empirically selected, and several other methods for calculating high-resolution time-velocity distributions were not considered. In this study, we compared four types of representative time-velocity distributions calculated from the Doppler-radar-received signals: STFT, wavelet transform, Wigner-Ville distribution, and smoothed pseudo-Wigner-Ville distribution. In addition, the identification accuracies of various parameter settings were also investigated. We observed that the optimally tuned STFT outperformed other high-resolution distributions, and a short length of the window function in the STFT process led to a reasonable accuracy; the best identification accuracy was 99% for the identification of twenty-five test subjects. These results indicate that STFT is the optimal time-velocity distribution for gait-based personal identification using the Doppler radar, although the time and velocity resolutions of the other methods were better than those of the STFT.

Indexed as

Deep LearningRadarFourier AnalysisGaitHumansUltrasonography, Dopplerbiometricsdeep learningDoppler radargait recognitionperson identificationtime-velocity distribution

Identifiers

PMID36679401
PMCPMC9864811

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.