ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2023
Incorporating a Novel Dual Transfer Learning Approach for Medical Images.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparative Analysis of Deep Learning Techniques in Alzheimer's Disease Diagnosis: Trends, Challenges, and Future Directions.MethodsX · 2026Review
- Deep Learning Approach for Biomedical Image Classification.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2026Review
- Development and evaluation of a multistage transfer learning framework for robust medical image analysis.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- IM- LTS: An Integrated Model for Lung Tumor Segmentation using Neural Networks and IoMT.MethodsX · 2025Article
- Deep Learning in Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: Current Status, Challenges, and Future Trends.MedComm · 2025Review
- Boosting Skin Cancer Classification: A Multi-Scale Attention and Ensemble Approach with Vision Transformers.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Applying YOLOv6 as an ensemble federated learning framework to classify breast cancer pathology images.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Effective BCDNet-based breast cancer classification model using hybrid deep learning with VGG16-based optimal feature extraction.BMC medical imaging · 2025Article
- Enhanced breast cancer diagnosis through integration of computer vision with fusion based joint transfer learning using multi modality medical images.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- MnasNet-SimAM: An Improved Deep Learning Model for the Identification of Common Wheat Diseases in Complex Real-Field Environments.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Enhanced cervical precancerous lesions detection and classification using Archimedes Optimization Algorithm with transfer learning.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Trustworthy deep learning framework for the detection of abnormalities in X-ray shoulder images.PloS one · 2024Article
- Lung Tumor Image Segmentation from Computer Tomography Images Using MobileNetV2 and Transfer Learning.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Recently, transfer learning approaches appeared to reduce the need for many classified medical images. However, these approaches still contain some limitations due to the mismatch of the domain between the source domain and the target domain. Therefore, this study aims to propose a novel approach, called Dual Transfer Learning (DTL), based on the convergence of patterns between the source and target domains. The proposed approach is applied to four pre-trained models (VGG16, Xception, ResNet50, MobileNetV2) using two datasets: ISIC2020 skin cancer images and ICIAR2018 breast cancer images, by fine-tuning the last layers on a sufficient number of unclassified images of the same disease and on a small number of classified images of the target task, in addition to using data augmentation techniques to balance classes and to increase the number of samples. According to the obtained results, it has been experimentally proven that the proposed approach has improved the performance of all models, where without data augmentation, the performance of the VGG16 model, Xception model, ResNet50 model, and MobileNetV2 model are improved by 0.28%, 10.96%, 15.73%, and 10.4%, respectively, while, with data augmentation, the VGG16 model, Xception model, ResNet50 model, and MobileNetV2 model are improved by 19.66%, 34.76%, 31.76%, and 33.03%, respectively. The Xception model obtained the highest performance compared to the rest of the models when classifying skin cancer images in the ISIC2020 dataset, as it obtained 96.83%, 96.919%, 96.826%, 96.825%, 99.07%, and 94.58% for accuracy, precision, recall, F1-score, sensitivity, and specificity respectively. To classify the images of the ICIAR 2018 dataset for breast cancer, the Xception model obtained 99%, 99.003%, 98.995%, 99%, 98.55%, and 99.14% for accuracy, precision, recall, F1-score, sensitivity, and specificity, respectively. Through these results, the proposed approach improved the models' performance when fine-tuning was performed on unclassified images of the same disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.