Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36679325›Full record

ArticlePolymers2023

Ultimate and Deflection Performance of Concrete Beams Strengthened in Flexure with Basalt-Textile-Reinforced Polymer Mortar.

Jun Deng, Minting Zhong, Zhuojian Zhang, Miaochang Zhu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Polymers, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jun DengSchool of Civil Engineering, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou 510006, China.
Minting ZhongSchool of Civil Engineering, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou 510006, China.
Zhuojian ZhangSchool of Civil and Transportation Engineering, Guangdong University of Technology, Guangzhou 510006, China.
Miaochang ZhuSchool of Civil Engineering, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou 510006, China.ORCID 0000-0003-2190-3826

Funding

Department of Education of Guangdong Province 2021KCXTD030Guangzhou Science and Technology Project 202201020160National Natural Science Foundation of China 51778151National Natural Science Foundation of China 52178278Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province 2022A1515012076
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper presents an investigation into the ultimate and serviceability behavior of concrete beams strengthened in flexure with basalt-textile-reinforced polymer mortar (BTRM). The bond performance at the interface between the BTRM and concrete was studied by performing single shear tests, and the effectiveness of using an adhesion promoter and impregnated resin for bond enhancement was explored. The results suggested that using an adhesion promoter and impregnated resin can improve the interfacial stress transfer and ensure the tensile failure of the basalt textile in BTRM. Afterward, four-point bending tests were conducted to study the flexural performance of strengthened beams. It was found that the flexural strength of strengthened beams increased with the amount of textile, and the strength increase was more prominent for the strengthened beams with end anchorages. The increase in the failure force was up to 37% for the beam strengthened with five layers of the textile and an end anchorage. The calculated flexural strength exhibited a percentage error of no more than 7% compared to the test results. In addition, the Bischoff-I Equation can closely estimate the effective moment of inertia and provide an accurate prediction of deflection for strengthened beams.

Indexed as

basalt textileBTRMeffective moment of inertiaflexural strengthflexural strengthening

Identifiers

PMID36679325
PMCPMC9866480

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.