ArticlePolymers2023
Designing Bioinspired Composite Structures via Genetic Algorithm and Conditional Variational Autoencoder.
Article in Polymers, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.
- Hierarchical Fractal Interfaces in 3D-Printed Stiff-Soft Polymer Composites: Fracture Resistance and Toughening Mechanisms.Polymers · 2026Article
- Inverse Neural Network Approach for Optimizing Chemical Composition in Shielded Metal Arc Weld Metals.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Nature's Load-Bearing Design Principles and Their Application in Engineering: A Review.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Biomineral-Based Composite Materials in Regenerative Medicine.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Designing composite materials with tailored stiffness and toughness is challenging due to the massive number of possible material and geometry combinations. Although various studies have applied machine learning techniques and optimization methods to tackle this problem, we still lack a complete understanding of the material effects at different positions and a systematic experimental procedure to validate the results. Here we study a two-dimensional (2D) binary composite system with an edge crack and grid-like structure using a Genetic Algorithm (GA) and Conditional Variational Autoencoder (CVAE), which can design a composite with desired stiffness and toughness. The fitness of each design is evaluated using the negative mean square error of their predicted stiffness and toughness and the target values. We use finite element simulations to generate a machine-learning dataset and perform tensile tests on 3D-printed specimens to validate our results. We show that adding soft material behind the crack tip, instead of ahead of the tip, tremendously increases the overall toughness of the composite. We also show that while GA generates composite designs with slightly better accuracy (both methods perform well, with errors below 20%), CVAE takes considerably less time (~1/7500) to generate designs. Our findings may provide insights into the effect of adding soft material at different locations of a composite system and may also provide guidelines for conducting experiments and Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) to validate the results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.