Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36678858›Full record

ArticlePharmaceutics2023

A Universal Pharmacological-Based List of Drugs with Anticholinergic Activity.

Marta Lavrador, Ana C Cabral, Manuel T Veríssimo, Fernando Fernandez-Llimos, Isabel V Figueiredo, M Margarida Castel-Branco

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pharmaceutics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Health-related quality of life and use of medication with anticholinergic activity in patients with multiple myeloma.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2023
    Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Marta LavradorPharmacology and Pharmaceutical Care Laboratory, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Coimbra, 3000-548 Coimbra, Portugal.
Ana C CabralPharmacology and Pharmaceutical Care Laboratory, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Coimbra, 3000-548 Coimbra, Portugal.
Manuel T VeríssimoCoimbra Institute for Clinical and Biomedical Research (iCBR), 3000-548 Coimbra, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-2793-2129
Fernando Fernandez-LlimosLaboratory of Pharmacology, Department of Drug Sciences, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Porto, 4050-313 Porto, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-8529-9595
Isabel V FigueiredoPharmacology and Pharmaceutical Care Laboratory, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Coimbra, 3000-548 Coimbra, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0003-0127-4575
M Margarida Castel-BrancoPharmacology and Pharmaceutical Care Laboratory, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Coimbra, 3000-548 Coimbra, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-6533-9932

Funding

Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (FCT) SFRH/BD/123678/2016
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Anticholinergic burden tools have relevant pharmacological gaps that may explain their limited predictive ability for clinical outcomes. The aim of this study was to provide a universal pharmacological-based list of drugs with their documented affinity for muscarinic receptors. A comprehensive literature review was performed to identify the anticholinergic burden tools. Drugs included in these instruments were searched in four pharmacological databases, and the investigation was supplemented with PubMed. The evidence regarding the potential antagonism of the five muscarinic receptors of each drug was assessed. The proportion of drugs included in the tools with an affinity for muscarinic receptors was evaluated. A universal list of drugs with anticholinergic activity was developed based on their documented affinity for the different subtypes of muscarinic receptors and their ability to cross the blood-brain barrier. A total of 23 tools were identified, including 304 different drugs. Only 48.68%, 47.70%, 48.03%, 43.75%, and 42.76% of the drugs had an affinity to the M1, M2, M3, M4, and M5 receptor, respectively, reported in any pharmacological database. The proportion of drugs with confirmed antagonism varied among the tools (36.8% to 100%). A universal pharmacological-based list of 133 drugs is presented. It should be further validated in different clinical settings.

Indexed as

agedanticholinergic burdencholinergic antagonistsclinical practicemuscarinicreceptors

Identifiers

PMID36678858
PMCPMC9863833

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.