ArticlePharmaceutics2022
CAT-Site: Predicting Protein Binding Sites Using a Convolutional Neural Network.
Article in Pharmaceutics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- An efficient ranking deep neural network algorithm for the prediction of Ca2+ binding sites of the protein.PloS one · 2026Article
- Computational approaches to druggable site identification: Current status and future perspective.Acta pharmaceutica Sinica. B · 2026Review
- Augmenting a training dataset of the generative diffusion model for molecular docking with artificial binding pockets.RSC advances · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Identifying binding sites on the protein surface is an important part of computer-assisted drug design processes. Reliable prediction of binding sites not only assists with docking algorithms, but it can also explain the possible side-effects of a potential drug as well as its efficiency. In this work, we propose a novel workflow for predicting possible binding sites of a ligand on a protein surface. We use proteins from the PDBbind and sc-PDB databases, from which we combine available ligand information for similar proteins using all the possible ligands rather than only a special sub-selection to generalize the work of existing research. After performing protein clustering and merging of ligands of similar proteins, we use a three-dimensional convolutional neural network that takes into account the spatial structure of a protein. Lastly, we combine ligandability predictions for points on protein surfaces into joint binding sites. Analysis of our model's performance shows that its achieved sensitivity is 0.829, specificity is 0.98, and F1 score is 0.517, and that for 54% of larger and pharmacologically relevant binding sites, the distance between their real and predicted centers amounts to less than 4 Å.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.