Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36678445›Full record

ArticlePathogens (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Integrated Biological Control of the Sugar Beet Weevil

Maria Zottele, Martina Mayrhofer, Hannah Embleton, Jürg Enkerli, Herbert Eigner, Eustachio Tarasco, Hermann Strasser

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. New Record ofJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Olfactory Responses ofInsects · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Maria ZotteleDepartment of Microbiology, Leopold-Franzens University Innsbruck, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria.ORCID 0000-0003-1578-3290
Martina MayrhoferAGRANA Research & Innovation Center GmbH, 3430 Tulln an der Donau, Austria.
Hannah EmbletonDepartment of Microbiology, Leopold-Franzens University Innsbruck, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria.
Jürg EnkerliMolecular Ecology, Agroscope, 8046 Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-5198-8392
Herbert EignerAGRANA Research & Innovation Center GmbH, 3430 Tulln an der Donau, Austria.
Eustachio TarascoDepartment of Soil, Plant and Food Sciences, University of Bari Aldo Moro, 70121 Bari, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-6310-186X
Hermann StrasserDepartment of Microbiology, Leopold-Franzens University Innsbruck, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria.ORCID 0000-0001-9555-111X
Agroscope · CHUniversity of Bari Aldo Moro · IT

Funding

Wellcome Trust 101445
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The mass occurrence of the sugar beet weevil (Asproparthenis punctiventris, previously Bothynoderes punctiventris) has been endangering sugar beet cultivation in Austria for centuries. Exacerbated by climatic and political changes (warmer, drier spring and limited access to chemical pesticides), new approaches are needed to counter the problem. The aim of our work was to test whether the bioinsecticide Metarhizium brunneum Ma 43 (formerly M. anisopliae var. anisopliae BIPESCO 5/F52) can be used as a sustainable plant protection product against the sugar beet weevil. Our goal was to control the pest in all its development stages through multiple applications. Therefore, GranMetTM-P, a granular formulation of M. brunneum Ma 43, was applied in spring to establish the fungus in the soil, whereas GranMetTM-WP, a liquid formulation of the production strain, was used in early summer on trap ditches and leaves to target the adult weevils. Soil and plant samples as well as weevils were collected during the planting season from the trial sites to evaluate the development of the fungus and the mycosis of the treated weevils. In addition, data on hibernating weevils and their emigration from untreated field sites was collected. In all field sites, the Metarhizium spp. abundance increased above the background level (<1000 CFU g−1 soil dry weight) after application of the product. With an increasing number of treatments per plot, and thus an increased contact possibility between pest and the fungus, a rise in the mycosis rate was observed. In conclusion, the various Metarhizium application strategies, which are already available or in testing, must be implemented to ensure control in both old and new sugar beet fields. Metarhizium is a further asset in the successful control of this sugar beet pest.

Indexed as

abundanceentomopathogenic fungusmass applicationmycosispest control

Identifiers

PMID36678445
PMCPMC9863636
OpenAlexW4313828918

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.