Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36678373›Full record

ArticlePathogens (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Postoperative Prevention of Urinary Tract Infections in Patients after Urogynecological Surgeries-Nonantibiotic Herbal (Canephron) versus Antibiotic Prophylaxis (Fosfomycin Trometamol): A Parallel-Group, Randomized, Noninferiority Experimental Trial.

Sara Wawrysiuk, Tomasz Rechberger, Agnieszka Kubik-Komar, Aleksandra Kolodynska, Kurt Naber, Pawel Miotla

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Sara Wawrysiuk2nd Department of Gynaecology, Medical University of Lublin, ul. Jaczewskiego 8, 20-954 Lublin, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-3466-2478
Tomasz Rechberger2nd Department of Gynaecology, Medical University of Lublin, ul. Jaczewskiego 8, 20-954 Lublin, Poland.
Agnieszka Kubik-KomarDepartment of Applied Mathematics and Computer Science, University of Life Sciences in Lublin, ul. Głęboka 28, 20-950 Lublin, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-4258-0133
Aleksandra Kolodynska2nd Department of Gynaecology, Medical University of Lublin, ul. Jaczewskiego 8, 20-954 Lublin, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-8422-5594
Kurt NaberDepartment of Urology, Technical University of Munich, Arcisstrasse 21, 80333 Munich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-1304-5403
Pawel Miotla2nd Department of Gynaecology, Medical University of Lublin, ul. Jaczewskiego 8, 20-954 Lublin, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-1902-6484
Medical University of Lublin · PLTechnical University of Munich · DEUniversity of Life Sciences in Lublin · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introduction and hypothesisUrinary tract infections (UTIs) are one of the most common complications of urogynecological surgeries. The risk of UTIs is increased by the catheterization of the bladder, intraoperative cystoscopy, and urine retention after the procedure. Due to increasing antibiotic resistance, there is a need to search for new methods of postoperative UTI prevention. Canephron is a mixture of century herbs, lovage roots, and rosemary leaves with diuretic, spasmolytic, anti-inflammatory, antibacterial, and nephroprotective properties. The aim of this study is to demonstrate the noninferiority of Canephron versus antibiotic prophylaxis with fosfomycin trometamol (FT), based on the collective results of postoperative urine culture analyses.

methodsOne hundred and twenty-five female patients were randomized into two groups before undergoing urogynecological surgeries, including a control group (n = 67), which received one dose of 3 g of FT the day after the procedure, and a study group (n = 58), which received Canephron three times a day for 14 days, starting the day after the procedure. All the patients were assessed using the Acute Cystitis Symptom Score (ACSS).

resultsUTIs were observed in 6.4% of the patients. There was no statistically significant difference between the use of FT and Canephron in terms of UTIs (Chi^2 N-1 = 0.8837;

conclusionsCanephron is noninferior to FT in the prevention of postoperative UTIs. The use of such a phytotherapeutic drug may help to decrease antibiotic consumption, which is closely connected to the growing trend of antibiotic resistance.

Indexed as

antibiotic resistancepelvic organ prolapseurinary incontinenceurinary tract infection

Identifiers

PMID36678373
PMCPMC9864930
OpenAlexW4313260000

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.