Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36678318›Full record

ArticleNutrients2023

Racial and Ethnic Comparisons in Satisfaction with Services Provided by the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children in California.

Alana M Chaney, Lorrene D Ritchie, Shannon E Whaley, Marisa M Tsai, Hallie R Randel-Schreiber, Catherine E Yepez, Susan Sabatier, Adrian Young, Martha Meza, Lauren E Au

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nutrients, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Alana M ChaneyDepartment of Nutrition, University of California Davis, Davis, CA 95616, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9357-8044
Lorrene D RitchieNutrition Policy Institute, Division of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of California, Oakland, CA 94607, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8038-1821
Shannon E WhaleyPublic Health Foundation Enterprises WIC, 12781 Schabarum Avenue, Irwindale, CA 91706, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9644-2206
Marisa M TsaiNutrition Policy Institute, Division of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of California, Oakland, CA 94607, USA.
Hallie R Randel-SchreiberCommunicable Disease Prevention Unit, San Francisco Department of Public Health, 101 Grove St, Rm 406, San Francisco, CA 94102, USA.
Catherine E YepezPublic Health Foundation Enterprises WIC, 12781 Schabarum Avenue, Irwindale, CA 91706, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3000-7153
Susan SabatierWIC Division, California Department of Public Health, 3901 Lennane Drive, Sacramento, CA 95834, USA.
Adrian YoungWIC Division, California Department of Public Health, 3901 Lennane Drive, Sacramento, CA 95834, USA.
Martha MezaPublic Health Foundation Enterprises WIC, 12781 Schabarum Avenue, Irwindale, CA 91706, USA.
Lauren E AuDepartment of Nutrition, University of California Davis, Davis, CA 95616, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2512-0063
Public Health Foundation Enterprises · USCalifornia Department of Public Health · USUniversity of California, Davis · USUniversity of California Division of Agriculture and Natural Resources · USSan Francisco Department of Public Health · US

Funding

David and Lucile Packard Foundation 2018-67712
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding satisfaction of nutrition education and other services provided in the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants and Children (WIC) is needed to ensure the program is responsive to the needs of diverse populations. This study examined the variation of WIC participants’ perceptions and satisfaction with WIC nutrition education and services by race, ethnicity, and language preference. Phone surveys were conducted in 2019 with California WIC families with children aged 1−4 years. While most participants (86%) preferred one-on-one nutrition education, online/mobile apps were also favored (69%). The majority (89%) found nutrition education equally important to receiving the WIC food package. Racial/ethnic groups differed in which WIC service they primarily valued as 20% of non-Hispanic White people rated the food package as more important than nutrition education compared to 5% of Spanish- and 6% of English-speaking Hispanic people, respectively. More Spanish (91%) and English-speaking Hispanic people (87%) than non-Hispanic white (79%) or Black people (74%) changed a behavior because of something they learned at WIC (p < 0.001). Spanish-speaking Hispanic people (90%) had the highest satisfaction with WIC nutrition education. Preferential differences among participants suggest that providing flexible options may improve program satisfaction and emphasizes the need for future studies to examine WIC services by race and ethnicity.

Indexed as

EthnicityFood AssistanceCaliforniaChildFemaleHealth EducationHispanic or LatinoHumansInfantPersonal Satisfactionchildrennutrition educationsatisfactionWIC

Identifiers

PMID36678318
PMCPMC9866005
OpenAlexW4316465966

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.