Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36678285›Full record

ArticleNutrients2023

A Quasi-Experimental Assessment of the Effect of the 2009 WIC Food Package Revisions on Breastfeeding Outcomes.

Kelly Kogan, Priyanka Anand, Sina Gallo, Alison Evans Cuellar

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nutrients, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kelly KoganDepartment of Health Administration and Policy, College of Public Health, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA 22030, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9450-5664
Priyanka AnandDepartment of Health Administration and Policy, College of Public Health, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA 22030, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7370-0484
Sina GalloDepartment of Nutritional Sciences, College of Family and Consumer Sciences, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6839-9834
Alison Evans CuellarDepartment of Health Administration and Policy, College of Public Health, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA 22030, USA.
George Mason University · USUniversity of Georgia · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Breastfeeding rates among infants participating in the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) are consistently lower than those of WIC nonparticipants. The 2009 WIC food package revisions were intended to incentivize breastfeeding among the WIC population. To examine the effectiveness of this policy change, we estimated an intent-to-treat regression-adjusted difference-in-difference model with propensity score weighting, an approach that allowed us to control for both secular trends in breastfeeding and selection bias. We used novel data from the Feeding Infants and Toddlers Survey from 2008 and 2016. We defined our treatment group as infants eligible for WIC based on household income and our control group as infants in households with incomes just above the WIC eligibility threshold. The breastfeeding outcomes we analyzed were whether the infants were ever breastfed, breastfed through 6 months, and breastfed exclusively through 6 months. We observed significant increases in infants that were ever breastfed in both the treatment group (10 percentage points; p < 0.01) and the control group (15 percentage points; p < 0.05); however, we did not find evidence that the difference between the two groups was statistically significant, suggesting that the 2009 revisions may not have had an effect on any of these breastfeeding outcomes.

Indexed as

Breast FeedingFood AssistanceFemaleFoodHumansInfantPropensity ScoreSurveys and Questionnairesbreastfeedingcausal inferencedifference-in-differences (DID)federal food assistance policyInfants, and Children (WIC)intent-to-treat analysisnutrition policypropensity scoresSpecial Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women

Identifiers

PMID36678285
PMCPMC9862204
OpenAlexW4316038191

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.