Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36678055›Full record

ArticleNanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Modeling and Optimization of Sensitivity and Creep for Multi-Component Sensing Materials.

Gangping Bi, Bowen Xiao, Yuanchang Lin, Shaoqiu Yan, Ying Tang, Songxiying He, Mingsheng Shang, Guotian He

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Gangping BiChongqing Institute of Green Intelligent Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chongqing 400714, China.
Bowen XiaoChongqing Institute of Green Intelligent Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chongqing 400714, China.
Yuanchang LinChongqing Institute of Green Intelligent Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chongqing 400714, China.
Shaoqiu YanChongqing Institute of Green Intelligent Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chongqing 400714, China.
Ying TangChongqing Institute of Green Intelligent Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chongqing 400714, China.
Songxiying HeChongqing Key Laboratory of Artificial Intelligence and Service Robot Control Technology, Chongqing Institute of Green Intelligent Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chongqing 400714, China.
Mingsheng ShangChongqing Institute of Green Intelligent Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chongqing 400714, China.
Guotian HeChongqing Institute of Green Intelligent Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chongqing 400714, China.

Funding

Chinese Academy of Sciences "Light of the West" Talent Training Introduction Program 2019-90Chongqing technology innovation and application development special cstc2021jscx-cylhX0009Cooperation projects between Chongqing universities in Chongqing and institutions affiliated with Chinese Academy of Sciences HZ2021011National Key R&D Program 2018YFB1306601
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pressure sensors urgently need high-performance sensing materials in order to be developed further. Sensitivity and creep are regarded as two key indices for assessing a sensor's performance. For the design and optimization of sensing materials, an accurate estimation of the impact of several parameters on sensitivity and creep is essential. In this study, sensitivity and creep were predicted using the response surface methodology (RSM) and support vector regression (SVR), respectively. The input parameters were the concentrations of nickel (Ni) particles, multiwalled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs), and multilayer graphene (MLG), as well as the magnetic field intensity (B). According to statistical measures, the SVR model exhibited a greater level of predictability and accuracy. The non-dominated sorting genetic-II algorithm (NSGA-II) was used to generate the Pareto-optimal fronts, and decision-making was used to determine the final optimal solution. With these conditions, the optimized results revealed an improved performance compared to the earlier study, with an average sensitivity of 0.059 kPa

Indexed as

creepmagnetic fieldMLGMWCNTsNiNSGA-IIRSMsensitivitySVR

Identifiers

PMID36678055
PMCPMC9862774

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.