ArticleMolecules (Basel, Switzerland)2023
Structural Analysis and Classification of Low-Molecular-Weight Hyaluronic Acid by Near-Infrared Spectroscopy: A Comparison between Traditional Machine Learning and Deep Learning.
Article in Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- ProWaste for proactive urban waste management using IoT and machine learning.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Deep learning-based automated detection of endometrioid endometrial carcinoma in histopathology.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Confusing low-molecular-weight hyaluronic acid (LMWHA) from acid degradation and enzymatic hydrolysis (named LMWHA-A and LMWHA-E, respectively) will lead to health hazards and commercial risks. The purpose of this work is to analyze the structural differences between LMWHA-A and LMWHA-E, and then achieve a fast and accurate classification based on near-infrared (NIR) spectroscopy and machine learning. First, we combined nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR), Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy, two-dimensional correlated NIR spectroscopy (2DCOS), and aquaphotomics to analyze the structural differences between LMWHA-A and LMWHA-E. Second, we compared the dimensionality reduction methods including principal component analysis (PCA), kernel PCA (KPCA), and t-distributed stochastic neighbor embedding (t-SNE). Finally, the differences in classification effect of traditional machine learning methods including partial least squares-discriminant analysis (PLS-DA), support vector classification (SVC), and random forest (RF) as well as deep learning methods including one-dimensional convolutional neural network (1D-CNN) and long short-term memory (LSTM) were compared. The results showed that genetic algorithm (GA)-SVC and RF were the best performers in traditional machine learning, but their highest accuracy in the test dataset was 90%, while the accuracy of 1D-CNN and LSTM models in the training dataset and test dataset classification was 100%. The results of this study show that compared with traditional machine learning, the deep learning models were better for the classification of LMWHA-A and LMWHA-E. Our research provides a new methodological reference for the rapid and accurate classification of biological macromolecules.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.