Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36677516›Full record

ReviewMicroorganisms2023

Microbial-Based Products to Control Soil-Borne Pathogens: Methods to Improve Efficacy and to Assess Impacts on Microbiome.

Magdalena Ptaszek, Loredana Canfora, Massimo Pugliese, Flavia Pinzari, Giovanna Gilardi, Paweł Trzciński, Eligio Malusà

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Microorganisms, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
11.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. New azoxystrobin clay carrier to control corn late wilt disease.World journal of microbiology & biotechnology · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Biocontrol of watermelon Fusarium wilt caused byFrontiers in microbiology · 2026
    Article
  6. ACS agricultural science & technology · 2025
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Identification ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2025
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Current insights on rice (Journal of Zhejiang University. Science. B
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Magdalena PtaszekThe National Institute of Horticultural Research, 96-100 Skierniewice, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-4738-3681
Loredana CanforaResearch Centre for Agriculture and Environment, Council for Agricultural Research and Economics, 00184 Roma, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-8442-5094
Massimo PuglieseAgroinnova, University of Torino, 10124 Torino, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-2271-3429
Flavia PinzariInstitute for Biological Systems, National Research Council of Italy, 00010 Montelibretti, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1083-8734
Giovanna GilardiAgroinnova, University of Torino, 10124 Torino, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6420-7444
Paweł TrzcińskiThe National Institute of Horticultural Research, 96-100 Skierniewice, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-4568-6504
Eligio MalusàThe National Institute of Horticultural Research, 96-100 Skierniewice, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-9802-3379
Instytut Ogrodnictwa – Państwowy Instytut Badawczy · PLUniversity of Turin · ITCereal Research Centre · ITNatural History Museum · GB

Funding

European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme 817946
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microbial-based products (either as biopesticide or biofertilizers) have a long history of application, though their use is still limited, mainly due to a perceived low and inconsistent efficacy under field conditions. However, their efficacy has always been compared to chemical products, which have a completely different mechanism of action and production process, following the chemical paradigm of agricultural production. This paradigm has also been applied to regulatory processes, particularly for biopesticides, making the marketing of microbial-based formulations difficult. Increased knowledge about bioinocula behavior after application to the soil and their impact on soil microbiome should foster better exploitation of microbial-based products in a complex environment such as the soil. Moreover, the multifunctional capacity of microbial strains with regard to plant growth promotion and protection should also be considered in this respect. Therefore, the methods utilized for these studies are key to improving the knowledge and understanding of microbial-based product activity and improving their efficacy, which, from farmers' point of view, is the parameter to assess the usefulness of a treatment. In this review, we are thus addressing aspects related to the production and formulation process, highlighting the methods that can be used to evaluate the functioning and impact of microbial-based products on soil microbiome, as tools supporting their use and marketing.

Indexed as

analytical methodsbiocontrolformulation strategiesmycorrhizaphenotypic arrays

Identifiers

PMID36677516
PMCPMC9867489
OpenAlexW4316466142

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.