Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36677347›Full record

ArticleMicroorganisms2022

Characterizing Effects of Microbial Biostimulants and Whole-Soil Inoculums for Native Plant Revegetation.

Matthew Alfonzetti, Sebastien Doleac, Charlotte H Mills, Rachael V Gallagher, Sasha Tetu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Microorganisms, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Matthew AlfonzettiSchool of Natural Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW 2109, Australia.
Sebastien DoleacSchool of Natural Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW 2109, Australia.
Charlotte H MillsAirSeed Technologies Australia Pty Ltd., Sydney, NSW 2000, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-5823-4924
Rachael V GallagherHawkesbury Institute for the Environment, Western Sydney University, Locked Bag 1797, Penrith, NSW 2751, Australia.
Sasha TetuSchool of Natural Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW 2109, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Soil microbes play important roles in plant health and ecosystem functioning, however, they can often be disturbed or depleted in degraded lands. During seed-based revegetation of such sites there is often very low germination and seedling establishment success, with recruitment of beneficial microbes to the rhizosphere one potential contributor to this problem. Here we investigated whether Australian native plant species may benefit from planting seed encapsulated within extruded seed pellets amended with one of two microbe-rich products: a commercial vermicast extract biostimulant or a whole-soil inoculum from a healthy reference site of native vegetation. Two manipulative glasshouse trials assessing the performance of two Australian native plant species (

Indexed as

extruded pelletsmicrobial amendmentPGPBplant growth-promoting bacteriaprobioticrevegetationseed coatingseed enhancement technologysoil restoration

Identifiers

PMID36677347
PMCPMC9867050

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.