ReviewMicromachines2023
Technical and Clinical Progress on Robot-Assisted Endovascular Interventions: A Review.
Review in Micromachines, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Robotic-assisted beating heart surgery: a comprehensive review.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Pooled it
- A Visual Support System for Stent-Assisted Treatment of Cerebral Aneurysms Using 3D Imaging and Augmented Reality.Neuroinformatics · 2026Article
- Bibliometric and knowledge-map analysis of research on robot-assisted vascular interventional surgery (2015-2025).Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Article
- Global trends and emerging frontiers in robot-assisted vascular intervention: a comprehensive bibliometric analysis.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Review
- Haptic Portable Robotic Device for Automated Guidewire or Catheter Navigation in Endovascular Procedures.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2026Article
- Current State and Future of Artificial Intelligence in Pediatric Interventional Radiology: A Narrative Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Evaluation of Fully Teleoperated Robotic Endovascular Interventions with Haptic Feedback: The SENTANTE Endovascular Robotic System.Cardiovascular and interventional radiology · 2026Article
- HAPTIC PORTABLE ROBOTIC DEVICE FOR AUTOMATED GUIDEWIRE OR CATHETER NAVIGATION IN ENDOVASCULAR PROCEDURES.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
- Advancements and challenges in autonomous endovascular interventional robotics: A comprehensive review.iScience · 2025Review
- Article
- Robotic-Assisted Vascular Surgery: Current Landscape, Challenges, and Future Directions.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Constructing a Management Evaluation Index System Based on Hierarchical Analysis in the Interventional Therapy of Hematological Surgery in Hospitals.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2025Article
- Robotic Systems in Cardiovascular Interventions: Evolving Platforms and the Path Forward.Methodist DeBakey cardiovascular journal · 2025Review
- Multifunctional Magnetic Catheter Robot with Triaxial Force Sensing Capability for Minimally Invasive Surgery.Research (Washington, D.C.) · 2025Article
- Ultrasound-Guided Real-Time Joint Space Control of a Robotic Transcatheter Delivery System.IEEE robotics and automation letters · 2024Article
- Modeling Non-linear Effects in a 4-DoF Robotic Transcatheter Delivery System.IEEE robotics and automation letters · 2024Article
- Continuum Robots and Magnetic Soft Robots: From Models to Interdisciplinary Challenges for Medical Applications.Micromachines · 2024Review
- Safety and feasibility study of a novel robotic system in an in vivo porcine vascular model.CVIR endovascular · 2024Article
- Neuroendovascular Surgery Applications in Craniocervical Trauma.Biomedicines · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Prior methods of patient care have changed in recent years due to the availability of minimally invasive surgical platforms for endovascular interventions. These platforms have demonstrated the ability to improve patients' vascular intervention outcomes, and global morbidities and mortalities from vascular disease are decreasing. Nonetheless, there are still concerns about the long-term effects of exposing interventionalists and patients to the operational hazards in the cath lab, and the perioperative risks that patients undergo. For these reasons, robot-assisted vascular interventions were developed to provide interventionalists with the ability to perform minimally invasive procedures with improved surgical workflow. We conducted a thorough literature search and presented a review of 130 studies published within the last 20 years that focused on robot-assisted endovascular interventions and are closely related to the current gains and obstacles of vascular interventional robots published up to 2022. We assessed both the research-based prototypes and commercial products, with an emphasis on their technical characteristics and application domains. Furthermore, we outlined how the robotic platforms enhanced both surgeons' and patients' perioperative experiences of robot-assisted vascular interventions. Finally, we summarized our findings and proposed three key milestones that could improve the development of the next-generation vascular interventional robots.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.