ArticleMicromachines2023
Long-Term Degradation Evaluation of the Mismatch of Sensitive Capacitance in MEMS Accelerometers.
Article in Micromachines, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Novel Asymmetric High-Performance MEMS Pendulum Capacitive Accelerometer.Micromachines · 2025Article
- Hypersensitive pressure sensors inspired by scorpion mechanosensory mechanisms for near-body flow detection in intelligent robots.Science advances · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
During long-term use, MEMS accelerometers will experience degradation, such as bias and scale factor changes. Bias of MEMS capacitive accelerometers usually comes from the mismatch of parasitic capacitance and sensitive capacitance. This paper focuses on the mismatch of sensitive capacitance and analyzes the mechanism of long-term degradation of MEMS accelerometers. Firstly, the effect of sensitive capacitance mismatch on the performance of a MEMS accelerometer was investigated. Secondly, a method of measuring the mismatch of sensitive capacitance was proposed, and the validation experiment shows that the accuracy of this measurement can be less than 1.10×10−5 of the sensitive capacitance. For the samples in this experiment, the measurement error of this method can be less than 0.36 fF. Finally, a high-temperature acceleration experiment was performed. The mismatch of the sensitive capacitance during the experiment was monitored based on the proposed method, and the experimental results are analyzed. The experimental result demonstrates that the mismatch of sensitive capacitance varies linearly with time. The change rates of sensitive capacitance mismatch for the two samples are 2.95×10−7 C0/h and 2.66×10−7 C0/h in the high-temperature acceleration experiment at 145 °C, respectively. The change in sensitive capacitance mismatch seems small, but it is not to be ignored during long-term use. The rate of change is similar for the same batch of samples. This could imply that the adverse effects due to the mismatch of sensitive capacitance changes can be reduced by compensating for this variation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.