Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36677232›Full record

ArticleMicromachines2023

Closed-Loop Microreactor on PCB for Ultra-Fast DNA Amplification: Design and Thermal Validation.

Panagiotis Skaltsounis, George Kokkoris, Theodoros G Papaioannou, Angeliki Tserepi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Micromachines, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Panagiotis SkaltsounisInstitute of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology, National Center of Scientific Research (NCSR) "Demokritos", Patr. Gregoriou Ε' and 27 Neapoleos Str., 15341 Aghia Paraskevi, Greece.
George KokkorisInstitute of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology, National Center of Scientific Research (NCSR) "Demokritos", Patr. Gregoriou Ε' and 27 Neapoleos Str., 15341 Aghia Paraskevi, Greece.ORCID 0000-0003-4507-7311
Theodoros G PapaioannouSchool of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens (NKUA), 75 Mikras Asias Str., 11527 Athens, Greece.ORCID 0000-0002-1552-3168
Angeliki TserepiInstitute of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology, National Center of Scientific Research (NCSR) "Demokritos", Patr. Gregoriou Ε' and 27 Neapoleos Str., 15341 Aghia Paraskevi, Greece.
National and Kapodistrian University of Athens · GRNational Centre of Scientific Research "Demokritos" · GR

Funding

European Regional Development Fund of the European Union and Greek national funds RESEARCH-CREATE-INNOVATE (project code: T1EDK-03565)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) is the most common method used for nucleic acid (DNA) amplification. The development of PCR-performing microfluidic reactors (μPCRs) has been of major importance, due to their crucial role in pathogen detection applications in medical diagnostics. Closed loop (CL) is an advantageous type of μPCR, which uses a circular microchannel, thus allowing the DNA sample to pass consecutively through the different temperature zones, in order to accomplish a PCR cycle. CL μPCR offers the main advantages of the traditional continuous-flow μPCR, eliminating at the same time most of the disadvantages associated with the long serpentine microchannel. In this work, the performance of three different CL μPCRs designed for fabrication on a printed circuit board (PCB) was evaluated by a computational study in terms of the residence time in each thermal zone. A 3D heat transfer model was used to calculate the temperature distribution in the microreactor, and the residence times were extracted by this distribution. The results of the computational study suggest that for the best-performing microreactor design, a PCR of 30 cycles can be achieved in less than 3 min. Subsequently, a PCB chip was fabricated based on the design that performed best in the computational study. PCB constitutes a great substrate as it allows for integrated microheaters inside the chip, permitting at the same time low-cost, reliable, reproducible, and mass-amenable fabrication. The fabricated chip, which, at the time of this writing, is the first CL μPCR chip fabricated on a PCB, was tested by measuring the temperatures on its surface with a thermal camera. These results were then compared with the ones of the computational study, in order to evaluate the reliability of the latter. The comparison of the calculated temperatures with the measured values verifies the accuracy of the developed model of the microreactor. As a result of that, a total power consumption of 1.521 W was experimentally measured, only ~7.3% larger than the one calculated (1.417 W). Full validation of the realized CL μPCR chip will be demonstrated in future work.

Indexed as

closed loopcomputational analysislab-on-chip (LoC)microreactorpoint of care (PoC)polymerase chain reaction (PCR)printed circuit board (PCB)

Identifiers

PMID36677232
PMCPMC9860919
OpenAlexW4313898453

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.