Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36676966›Full record

ReviewMetabolites2022

Using Machine Vision of Glycolytic Elements to Predict Breast Cancer Recurrences: Design and Implementation.

Howard R Petty

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Metabolites, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Howard R PettyDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Michigan Medical School, 1000 Wall Street, Ann Arbor, MI 48105, USA.
University of Michigan–Ann Arbor · US

Funding

Michigan Economic Development FundMildred E. Swanson Foundation
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A major goal of biomedical research has been the early and quantitative identification of patients who will subsequently experience a cancer recurrence. In this review, I discuss the ability of glycolytic enzyme and transporter patterns within tissues to detect sub-populations of cells within ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) lesions that specifically precede cancer recurrences. The test uses conventional formalin fixed paraffin embedded tissue samples. The accuracy of this machine vision test rests on the identification of relevant glycolytic components that promote enhanced glycolysis (phospho-Ser226-glucose transporter type 1 (phospho-Ser226-GLUT1) and phosphofructokinase type L (PFKL)), their trafficking in tumor cells and tissues as judged by computer vision, and their high signal-to-noise levels. For each patient, machine vision stratifies micrographs from each lesion as the probability that the lesion originated from a recurrent sample. This stratification method removes overlap between the predicted recurrent and non-recurrent patients, which eliminates distribution-dependent false positives and false negatives. The method identifies computationally negative samples as non-recurrent and computationally positive samples are recurrent; computationally positive non-recurrent samples are likely due to mastectomies. The early phosphorylation and isoform switching events, spatial locations and clustering constitute important steps in metabolic reprogramming. This work also illuminates mechanistic steps occurring prior to a recurrence, which may contribute to the development of new drugs.

Indexed as

breast cancer recurrencescomputer-assisted diagnosisglycolysismachine learningphosphofructokinase type Lphospho-Ser226-glucose transporter type 1

Identifiers

PMID36676966
PMCPMC9866082
OpenAlexW4313244613

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.