Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36676933›Full record

ReviewMetabolites2022

Common Strategies and Factors Affecting Off-Line Breath Sampling and Volatile Organic Compounds Analysis Using Thermal Desorption-Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry (TD-GC-MS).

Kinga Westphal, Danuta Dudzik, Małgorzata Waszczuk-Jankowska, Beata Graff, Krzysztof Narkiewicz, Michał Jan Markuszewski

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Metabolites, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Systematic comparison of methods for offline breath sampling.Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. High-quality identification of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) originating from breath.Metabolomics : Official journal of the Metabolomic Society · 2024
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kinga WestphalDepartment of Hypertension and Diabetology, Medical University of Gdansk, 80-214 Gdansk, Poland.
Danuta DudzikDepartment of Biopharmaceutics and Pharmacodynamics, Faculty of Pharmacy, Medical University of Gdansk, 80-416 Gdansk, Poland.
Małgorzata Waszczuk-JankowskaDepartment of Biopharmaceutics and Pharmacodynamics, Faculty of Pharmacy, Medical University of Gdansk, 80-416 Gdansk, Poland.
Beata GraffDepartment of Hypertension and Diabetology, Medical University of Gdansk, 80-214 Gdansk, Poland.
Krzysztof NarkiewiczDepartment of Hypertension and Diabetology, Medical University of Gdansk, 80-214 Gdansk, Poland.
Michał Jan MarkuszewskiDepartment of Biopharmaceutics and Pharmacodynamics, Faculty of Pharmacy, Medical University of Gdansk, 80-416 Gdansk, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-1166-4817
Gdańsk Medical University · PL

Funding

National Science Center UMO-2018/29/B/NZ5/02491
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An analysis of exhaled breath enables specialists to noninvasively monitor biochemical processes and to determine any pathological state in the human body. Breath analysis holds the greatest potential to remold and personalize diagnostics; however, it requires a multidisciplinary approach and collaboration of many specialists. Despite the fact that breath is considered to be a less complex matrix than blood, it is not commonly used as a diagnostic and prognostic tool for early detection of disordered conditions due to its problematic sampling, analysis, and storage. This review is intended to determine, standardize, and marshal experimental strategies for successful, reliable, and especially, reproducible breath analysis.

Indexed as

breath sampling and analysisgas chromatographymass spectrometrymetabolomicsthermal desorptionvolatile organic compounds (VOC)

Identifiers

PMID36676933
PMCPMC9866406
OpenAlexW4312070591

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.