Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36676747›Full record

ArticleMedicina (Kaunas, Lithuania)2023

Comparison between Robotic Single-Site and Laparoendoscopic Single-Site Hysterectomy: Multicentric Analysis of Surgical Outcomes.

Barbara Gardella, Mattia Dominoni, Andrea Gritti, Liliana Mereu, Stefano Bogliolo, Marco Torella, Francesco Fanfani, Mario Malzoni, Aldina Couso, Alvaro Zapico and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Barbara GardellaDepartment of Clinical, Surgical, Diagnostic and Paediatric Sciences, University of Pavia, 27100 Pavia, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-0812-8995
Mattia DominoniDepartment of Clinical, Surgical, Diagnostic and Paediatric Sciences, University of Pavia, 27100 Pavia, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6322-607X
Andrea GrittiDepartment of Clinical, Surgical, Diagnostic and Paediatric Sciences, University of Pavia, 27100 Pavia, Italy.
Liliana MereuMaternal and Child Department, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cannizzaro Hospital, 95122 Catania, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-0610-5132
Stefano BoglioloDepartment of Clinical, Surgical, Diagnostic and Paediatric Sciences, University of Pavia, 27100 Pavia, Italy.
Marco TorellaObstetrics and Gynecology Unit, Department of Woman, Child and General and Specialized Surgery, University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, 80138 Naples, Italy.
Francesco FanfaniGynecologic Oncology Unit, Department of Women, Children and Public Health Sciences, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy.
Mario MalzoniEndoscopica Malzoni-Center for Advanced Endoscopic Gynecological Surgery, 83100 Avellino, Italy.
Aldina CousoGynecology Department, Principe de Asturias University Hospital, 28805 Madrid, Spain.
Alvaro ZapicoGynecology Department, Principe de Asturias University Hospital, 28805 Madrid, Spain.
Ignacio ZapardielGynecologic Oncology Unit, La Paz University Hospital, 28046 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-9175-7767
University of Pavia · ITHospital Universitario Príncipe de Asturias · ESHospital Universitario La Paz · ESOspedale Santa Chiara · ITUniversità Cattolica del Sacro Cuore · ITUniversity of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli" · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

MATERIALS AND

methodsWe consecutively enrolled 278 women between 2012 and 2019 in this multicentre trial. The patients underwent robotic single-site hysterectomy (RSSH) or laparoendoscopic single-site hysterectomy (LESSH) procedures with or without salpingo-oophorectomy for benign indications. Surgical parameters and surgical outcomes were analysed.

resultsThere was a statistical difference between the two surgical techniques for total operative time (

conclusionsLESSH outperformed RSSH in terms of surgical performance and clinical outcomes, with no differences in adverse events.

Indexed as

LaparoscopyRobotic Surgical ProceduresFemaleHumansHysterectomyRetrospective StudiesTreatment Outcomehysterectomylaparoscopyminimally invasive surgeryrobotic surgery

Identifiers

PMID36676747
PMCPMC9866110
OpenAlexW4313826461

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.