Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36676689›Full record

ArticleMedicina (Kaunas, Lithuania)2022

Is There a Risk of Misinterpretation of Potassium Concentration from Undetectable Hemolysis Using a POCT Blood Gas Analyzer in the Emergency Department?

Marianna Nigro, Gabriele Valli, Maria Luisa Marchionne, Dario Sattarinia, Fabiana Silvestrini, Daniele De Pietro, Simone Fazzini, Giorgia Roselli, Andrea Spallino, Valentina Praticò and 8 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Marianna NigroPostgraduate School of Emergency Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-3973-8657
Gabriele ValliEmergency Department, San Giovanni Addolorata Hospital, 00184 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-0576-6104
Maria Luisa MarchionnePostgraduate School of Emergency Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy.
Dario SattariniaPostgraduate School of Emergency Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy.
Fabiana SilvestriniPostgraduate School of Emergency Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy.
Daniele De PietroPostgraduate School of Emergency Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy.
Simone FazziniPostgraduate School of Emergency Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy.
Giorgia RoselliPostgraduate School of Emergency Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy.
Andrea SpallinoPostgraduate School of Emergency Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy.
Valentina PraticòPostgraduate School of Emergency Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy.
Enrico MiranteEmergency Department, S. Eugenio Hospital, 00144 Rome, Italy.
Ersilia CastaldoEmergency Department, S. Eugenio Hospital, 00144 Rome, Italy.
Francesco Rocco PuglieseEmergency Department, Sandro Pertini Hospital, 00157 Rome, Italy.
Claudia CicchiniEmergency Department, Sandro Pertini Hospital, 00157 Rome, Italy.
Carlo AnconaEmergency Department, San Giovanni Addolorata Hospital, 00184 Rome, Italy.
Francesca De MarcoEmergency Department, San Giovanni Addolorata Hospital, 00184 Rome, Italy.
Maria Pia RuggieriEmergency Department, San Giovanni Addolorata Hospital, 00184 Rome, Italy.
Salvatore Di SommaPostgraduate School of Emergency Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy.
Sapienza University of Rome · ITAzienda Ospedaliera San Giovanni Addolorata · ITOspedale Sandro Pertini · ITSt. Eugenio Hospital · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Objectives: Hemolysis is reported to be present in up to 10% of blood gas specimens in the central lab; however, few data on the incidence of hemolysis using a point-of-care testing (POCT) blood gas analysis are available in the setting of the emergency department. The aims of this study were: (1) to analyze the prevalence of hemolysis in blood gas samples collected in the ED using a POCT device; and (2) to evaluate the impact of hemolysis on blood sample results and its clinical consequences. Materials and Methods: We collected 525 consecutive POCT arterial blood gas samples using syringes with electrolyte-balanced heparin within 3 different EDs in the metropolitan area of Rome. Immediately after the collection, the blood samples were checked for the presence of hemolysis with a POCT instrument (i.e., HEMCHECK, H-10 ®). The samples were then subsequently processed for blood gasses, and an electrolytes analysis by a second operator blinded for the hemolysis results. A venous blood sample was simultaneously collected, analyzed for it’s potassium value, and used as a reference. Results: Of the samples, 472 were considered for the statistics, while 53 were excluded due to the high percentage of hemolysis due to operator fault in carrying out the measurement. The final mean hemolysis per operator was 12% (±13% SD), and the total final hemolysis was 14.4%.Potassium (K+) was significantly higher in the hemolyzed group compared with the non-hemolyzed sample (4.60 ± 0.11 vs. 3.99 ± 0.03 mEq/L; p < 0.001), and there were differences between arterial potassium versus venous potassium (D(a-v) K+, 0.29 ± 0.06 vs.−0.19 ± 0.02 mEq/L, p < 0.01). A Bland−Altman analysis confirmed that hemolysis significantly overestimated blood potassium level. Conclusion: Almost 12% of POCT blood gas analysis samples performed in the ED could be hemolyzed, and the presence of this hemolysis is not routinely detected. This could cause an error in the interpretation of the results, leading to the consideration of potassium concentrations being below the lower limit within the normal limits and also leading to the diagnosis of false hyperkalemia, which would have potential clinical consequences in therapeutic decision-making in the ED. The routine use of a POCT hemolysis detector could help prevent any misdiagnoses.

Indexed as

HemolysisPotassiumBlood Gas AnalysisEmergency Service, HospitalHumansPoint-of-Care TestingPotassiumblood samplesPOCT arterial blood gasses analysis in EDPOCT device for hemolysis detectionpre-analytical errors

Identifiers

PMID36676689
PMCPMC9861078
OpenAlexW4313413103

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.