Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36676653›Full record

ArticleMedicina (Kaunas, Lithuania)2022

Fitts' Tapping Task as a New Test for Cognition and Manual Dexterity in Multiple Sclerosis: Validation Study.

Klaudia Duka Glavor, Bianca Weinstock-Guttman, Gorka Vuletić, Iva Vranić Ivanac, Nataša Šimić, Thomas J Covey, Dejan Jakimovski

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 74% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Klaudia Duka GlavorDepartment of Neurology, General Hospital Zadar, 23000 Zadar, Croatia.
Bianca Weinstock-GuttmanJacobs MS Center, Department of Neurology, Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University at Buffalo, State University of New York, Buffalo, NY 14202, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6732-151X
Gorka VuletićDepartment of Psychology, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, University J. J. Strossmayer in Osijek, 31000 Osijek, Croatia.
Iva Vranić IvanacDepartment of Psychology, University of Zadar, 23000 Zadar, Croatia.
Nataša ŠimićDepartment of Psychology, University of Zadar, 23000 Zadar, Croatia.ORCID 0000-0002-4215-3668
Thomas J CoveyDivision of Cognitive and Behavioral Neurosciences, Department of Neurology, Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University at Buffalo, State University of New York, Buffalo, NY 14214, USA.
Dejan JakimovskiJacobs MS Center, Department of Neurology, Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University at Buffalo, State University of New York, Buffalo, NY 14202, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7114-4958
University of Zadar · HRJacobs (United States) · USUniversity at Buffalo, State University of New York · USUniversity of Osijek · HR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction. Studies suggest that people with multiple sclerosis (pwMS) experience continuous and subclinical physical worsening, even as early as their disease diagnosis. Validating sensitive and reproducible tests that can capture subclinical disease activity early in the disease are clinically useful and highly warranted. We aimed at validating the utility of Fitts’ Tapping Task (FTT) as reproducible measure of psychomotor performance in pwMS. Materials and Methods. Thirty newly-diagnosed pwMS (within 2 years of diagnosis and Expanded Disability Status Scale; EDSS ≤ 2.0), 30 people with migraine (pwMig), and 30 healthy controls (HCs) underwent a psychomotor assessment using the FTT, O’Connor hand dexterity test, and Visual Reaction Time Test (VRTT). Hand strength was measured using a hand-grip dynamometer. Subjects also provided patient-reported outcomes (PROs) using the 36-Item Short Form Survey (SF-36). Intrarater and interrater reproducibility was acquired on 5 HCs by two independent operators. Test−retest reproducibility was determined in 5 pwMS over a 1-week follow-up. Eight pwMS returned for the same test procedures 2 years after the baseline assessment. Bland−Altman plots were used to determine the minimally detectable change (MDC) and logistic regression models determined the ability to differentiate between newly-diagnosed pwMS and HCs. Results. FTT exhibited a high intrarater and interrater reproducibility (interclass correlation coefficient of 0.961, p < 0.001). The test−retest demonstrated an MDC of the average FTT at > 15%. PwMS had significantly a slower FTT time and O’Connor dexterity time when compared to pwMig and HCs (p < 0.001 for both). Higher Fitts’ difficulty levels (4th and 6th difficulty) and average performance on the O’Connor test were able to differentiate newly-diagnosed pwMS from HCs with 80% accuracy (p < 0.01). Slower FTT performance was correlated with worse PROs due to physical health. Over the 2-year follow-up, and despite being clinically stable (no change in EDSS), 6 out of 8 (75%) pwMS had more than a 15% worsening in their average FTT time. Conclusions. FTT is a highly-reproducible test for measuring psychomotor performance in newly-diagnosed pwMS. FTT can capture insidious worsening in psychomotor performance and cognitive function in early stages of MS.

Indexed as

Multiple SclerosisCognitionHumansPsychomotor PerformanceReaction TimeReproducibility of Resultscognitive processing speedfitts tapping taskmanual dexteritymultiple sclerosispsychomotor performance

Identifiers

PMID36676653
PMCPMC9867060
OpenAlexW4313259715

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.