Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36676371›Full record

ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Comparison of Standardized Methods for Determining the Diffusion Coefficient of Chloride in Concrete with Thermodynamic Model of Migration.

Zofia Szweda, Jacek Gołaszewski, Pratanu Ghosh, Petr Lehner, Petr Konečný

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Zofia SzwedaDepartment of Building Structures, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Silesian University of Technology, 44-100 Gliwice, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-5543-7494
Jacek GołaszewskiDepartment of Building Processes and Building Physics, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Silesian University of Technology, 44-100 Gliwice, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-4110-5581
Pratanu GhoshCivil and Environmental Engineering Department, California State University, Fullerton, CA 92834, USA.
Petr LehnerDepartment of Structural Mechanics, Faculty of Civil Engineering, VSB-Technical University of Ostrava, 70800 Ostrava, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0002-1478-5027
Petr KonečnýDepartment of Structural Mechanics, Faculty of Civil Engineering, VSB-Technical University of Ostrava, 70800 Ostrava, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0001-6667-7522

Funding

Czech Science Foundation GA 2219812SSilesian University of Technology POWR.03.05.00-00-Z098/17
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This research paper is the result of observations made during tests according to various standards carried out on behalf of industry. The article presents diffusion coefficient values calculated according to the thermodynamic migration model for twenty different concrete mixes and some selected mixes of the codified approaches known as ASTM 1202, NT BUILD 443, NT BUILD 492, ASTM 1556. The method used here, according to the thermodynamic model of migration, allows determination of the value of the diffusion coefficient after short studies of the migration of chloride ions into concrete and was described in earlier works by one of the authors. Unfortunately, when using standard methods, the values of diffusion coefficients differ significantly from each other. In each concrete, diffusion tests were carried out in the conditions of long-term natural diffusion to verify the values determined by standard methods and according to the thermodynamic model of migration. The analysis conducted for this research paper reveals that the chloride permeability test method according to the standard ASTM C1202-97 has an almost 2.8-fold greater dispersion of the obtained results compared to the thermodynamic model of migration. It was observed that the standard NT BUILD 492 has a 3.8-fold dispersion of results compared to the method with the thermodynamic model of migration. The most time-consuming method is the standard method NT BUILD 443. The largest 3.5-fold dispersion of values concerning the reference value are observed in that method. Moreover, a method based on a thermodynamic migration model seems to be the best option of all analyzed methods. It is a quite quick, but laborious, method that should be tested for a larger number of concrete mixes. A great advantage of this method is that it is promising for a wide range of concrete mixtures, both plain concrete and concrete with various additives and admixtures, as well as high-performance concrete.

Indexed as

chloride ionschloride migrationdiffusion coefficientdiffusion modelFick’s second lawstandard methods

Identifiers

PMID36676371
PMCPMC9862715

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.