Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36676309›Full record

ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Comparative Evaluation of the Tribological Properties of Polymer Materials with Similar Shore Hardness Working in Metal-Polymer Friction Systems.

Daniel Pieniak, Radosław Jedut, Leszek Gil, Włodzimierz Kupicz, Anna Borucka, Jarosław Selech, Grzegorz Bartnik, Krzysztof Przystupa, Zbigniew Krzysiak

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Daniel PieniakFaculty of Transport and Computer Science, WSEI University, Projektowa 4, 20-209 Lublin, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-7807-3515
Radosław JedutFaculty of Transport and Computer Science, WSEI University, Projektowa 4, 20-209 Lublin, Poland.
Leszek GilFaculty of Transport and Computer Science, WSEI University, Projektowa 4, 20-209 Lublin, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-8978-7388
Włodzimierz KupiczMilitary Institute of Armoured and Automotive Technology, Okuniewska 1, 05-070 Sulejówek, Poland.
Anna BoruckaFaculty of Security, Logistics and Management, Military University of Technology, Str. gen. S. Kaliskiego 2, 00-908 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-7892-9640
Jarosław SelechFaculty of Transport and Civil Engineering, Poznan University of Technology, Piotrowo 3, 60-965 Poznan, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-2656-3800
Grzegorz BartnikFaculty of Transport and Computer Science, WSEI University, Projektowa 4, 20-209 Lublin, Poland.
Krzysztof PrzystupaDepartment of Automation, Lublin University of Technology, Nadbystrzycka 36, 20-618 Lublin, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-4361-2763
Zbigniew KrzysiakFaculty of Production Engineering, University of Life Sciences in Lublin, Głęboka 28, 20-612 Lublin, Poland.

Funding

Poznań University of Technology 0414/SBAD/3622
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This article presents comparative tests of contact strength and tribological wear resistance of polymer sliding materials of the polyamide group. The aim of this work was to study Shore hardness, indentation hardness, modulus, creep, relaxation, Martens hardness and sliding wear resistance of two commercial materials. One of these materials was produced with the recycling process in mind. Abrasion tests were performed against a stainless-steel ball (100CRr6) on a normal load of 5 N for 23,830 friction cycles. The samples were tested under dry friction conditions and taking into account the hydrothermal factor, the presence of which was assumed in the anticipated operating conditions. It was distilled water at a temperature of 50 °C. The volumetric wear of the samples under various environmental conditions was assessed and related to the mechanical properties, in particular, Shore hardness. This mechanical size, which characterizes the surface, was considered the most frequently used by engineers selecting polymeric materials for tribological applications in industry. The Shore hardness of both materials was similar, which may indicate similar tribological performance properties. However, research and analysis indicate the need to use measures that directly correspond to tribological wear. The friction and wear of both materials varied. The coefficient of friction in hydrothermal conditions was lower and the wear was higher than in the dry friction test. It seems that it was not hardness that determined the suitability in the anticipated operating conditions, but the ability to form a sliding layer on the friction surface. The properties of the material that has been envisaged as a replacement may be appropriate for the intended uses.

Indexed as

coefficient testsfrictionpolymerroughnessShore hardnesswear factor

Identifiers

PMID36676309
PMCPMC9865190

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.