Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36676121›Full record

ReviewLife (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Therapeutic Strategies against Biofilm Infections.

Sonal Mishra, Amit Gupta, Vijay Upadhye, Suresh C Singh, Rajeshwar P Sinha, Donat-P Häder

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Life (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 60 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
60citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
15.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

60 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 103 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. The role of uropathogenicCurrent urology · 2026
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Molecular mechanisms drivingFrontiers in molecular biosciences · 2026
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Virus Enhanced Microrobots for Biofilm Eradication.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2026
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sonal MishraLaboratory of Photobiology and Molecular Microbiology, Centre of Advanced Study in Botany, Institute of Science, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi 221005, Uttar Pradesh, India.ORCID 0000-0002-5492-4124
Amit GuptaLaboratory of Photobiology and Molecular Microbiology, Centre of Advanced Study in Botany, Institute of Science, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi 221005, Uttar Pradesh, India.ORCID 0000-0002-2646-1628
Vijay UpadhyeDepartment of Microbiology, Parul Institute of Applied Science (PIAS), Center of Research for Development (CR4D), Parul University, Vadodara 391760, Gujarat, India.ORCID 0000-0002-8821-1720
Suresh C SinghPathkits Healthcare Pvt. Ltd., Gurugram 122001, Haryana, India.ORCID 0000-0002-5056-7246
Rajeshwar P SinhaLaboratory of Photobiology and Molecular Microbiology, Centre of Advanced Study in Botany, Institute of Science, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi 221005, Uttar Pradesh, India.ORCID 0000-0002-0112-6161
Donat-P HäderDepartment of Botany, Emeritus from Friedrich-Alexander University, 91096 Möhrendorf, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-4295-5660
Banaras Hindu University · INParul University · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A biofilm is an aggregation of surface-associated microbial cells that is confined in an extracellular polymeric substance (EPS) matrix. Infections caused by microbes that form biofilms are linked to a variety of animals, including insects and humans. Antibiotics and other antimicrobials can be used to remove or eradicate biofilms in order to treat infections. However, due to biofilm resistance to antibiotics and antimicrobials, clinical observations and experimental research clearly demonstrates that antibiotic and antimicrobial therapies alone are frequently insufficient to completely eradicate biofilm infections. Therefore, it becomes crucial and urgent for clinicians to properly treat biofilm infections with currently available antimicrobials and analyze the results. Numerous biofilm-fighting strategies have been developed as a result of advancements in nanoparticle synthesis with an emphasis on metal oxide np. This review focuses on several therapeutic strategies that are currently being used and also those that could be developed in the future. These strategies aim to address important structural and functional aspects of microbial biofilms as well as biofilms' mechanisms for drug resistance, including the EPS matrix, quorum sensing (QS), and dormant cell targeting. The NPs have demonstrated significant efficacy against bacterial biofilms in a variety of bacterial species. To overcome resistance, treatments such as nanotechnology, quorum sensing, and photodynamic therapy could be used.

Indexed as

biofilmbiofilm infectionsdrug resistanceEPS matrixnanoparticlesquorum sensing

Identifiers

PMID36676121
PMCPMC9866932
OpenAlexW4313891011

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.