Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36676072›Full record

ReviewLife (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Infectious Risks Related to Umbilical Venous Catheter Dwell Time and Its Replacement in Newborns: A Narrative Review of Current Evidence.

Lucia Corso, Martina Buttera, Francesco Candia, Francesca Sforza, Katia Rossi, Licia Lugli, Francesca Miselli, Luca Bedetti, Cecilia Baraldi, Laura Lucaccioni and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Life (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Umbilical vein catheterisation for the family physician working in primary health care.South African family practice : official journal of the South African Academy of Family Practice/Primary Care · 2024
    Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Lucia CorsoSchool of Pediatrics Residency, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, 41224 Modena, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2102-2674
Martina ButteraSchool of Pediatrics Residency, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, 41224 Modena, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-4960-2443
Francesco CandiaSchool of Pediatrics Residency, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, 41224 Modena, Italy.
Francesca SforzaSchool of Pediatrics Residency, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, 41224 Modena, Italy.
Katia RossiNeonatal Intensive Care Unit, University Hospital of Modena, 41224 Modena, Italy.
Licia LugliNeonatal Intensive Care Unit, University Hospital of Modena, 41224 Modena, Italy.
Francesca MiselliNeonatal Intensive Care Unit, University Hospital of Modena, 41224 Modena, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-5991-8949
Luca BedettiNeonatal Intensive Care Unit, University Hospital of Modena, 41224 Modena, Italy.
Cecilia BaraldiNeonatal Intensive Care Unit, University Hospital of Modena, 41224 Modena, Italy.
Laura LucaccioniPediatrics Unit, University Hospital of Modena, 41224 Modena, Italy.
Lorenzo IughettiSchool of Pediatrics Residency, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, 41224 Modena, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-0370-7872
Alberto BerardiSchool of Pediatrics Residency, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, 41224 Modena, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-3534-7499
University of Modena and Reggio Emilia · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The use of umbilical venous catheters (UVCs) has become the standard of care in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) to administer fluids, medications and parenteral nutrition. However, it is well known that UVCs can lead to some serious complications, both mechanical and infective, including CLABSI (Central Line-Associated Bloodstream Infections). Most authors recommend removing UVC within a maximum of 14 days from its placement. However, the last Infusion Therapy Standards of Practice (INS) guidelines recommends limiting the UVC dwell time to 7 to 10 days, to reduce risks of infectious and thrombotic complications. These guidelines also suggest as an infection prevention strategy to remove UVC after 4 days, followed by the insertion of a PICC if a central line is still needed. Nevertheless, the maximum UVC dwell time to reduce the risk of CLABSI is still controversial, as well as the time of its replacement with a PICC. In this study we reviewed a total of 177 articles, found by using the PubMed database with the following search strings: "UVC AND neonates", "(neonate* OR newborn*) AND (UVC OR central catheter*) AND (infection*)". We also analyze the INS guidelines to provide the reader an updated overview on this topic. The purpose of this review is to give updated information on CVCs infectious risks by examining the literature in this field. These data could help clinicians in deciding the best time to remove or to replace the UVC with a PICC, to reduce CLABSIs risk. Despite the lack of strong evidence, the risk of CLABSI seems to be minimized when UVC is removed/replaced within 7 days from insertion and this indication is emerging from more recent and larger studies.

Indexed as

CLABSIinfectionneonatesUVC

Identifiers

PMID36676072
PMCPMC9863057
OpenAlexW4313472490

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.