ArticleJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland)2022
An Increase in Specialist Treatment for Onychomycosis: An Unexplained Tendency. A Retrospective Study of Patients Treated for Onychomycosis in Danish Hospitals from 1994 to 2018.
Article in Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Patient Characteristics, Diagnostic Testing Utilization, and Antifungal Prescribing Pattern for Onychomycosis in the USA: A Cohort Study Using DataDerm, 2016-2022.Skin appendage disorders · 2025Article
- Clinical Diagnosis and Laboratory Testing of Abnormal Appearing Toenails: A Retrospective Assessment of Confirmatory Testing for Onychomycosis in the United States, 2022-2023.Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Onychomycosis is a common disease with a significant negative impact on quality of life. While the disease is usually manageable in general practice, a proportion of patients need specialist treatment in academic hospital clinics. However, it is an unknown question whether the incidence in those needing specialist treatments is changing. Furthermore, the comorbidity burden in this patient population severely affected by onychomycosis has never been characterized. We conducted a retrospective study on patients treated for onychomycosis in Danish hospitals from 1994 to 2018. The cohort was observed for 24 years, and the data comprise 7.2 million Danes and their hospital diagnoses. A disease trajectory algorithm was used to examine the comorbidity burden in the cohort. A total of 2,271 patients received hospital treatment for onychomycosis during the time period, of which 1358 (59.8%) were men. The data show an increase in the incidence of hospital-treated cases since 2012 and that the most common comorbidities in this patient population include cardiovascular disease, alcohol-related diagnoses, and diabetes. One explanation of the increase in specialist treatment may include a general increase in patients with decreased resilience to fungal disease. This lack of resilience may both include an increasing elderly population with atherosclerosis, diabetes, and immunosuppression but also a potential increase in patients treated with immunosuppressive agents. Another possible explanation may include a shift in patient expectations in the case of treatment failure. Thus, patients may have an increasing demand for specialist treatment. While our data document an increase in the number of patients in need of specialist treatment for onychomycosis, we suggest future research to examine the general incidence of onychomycosis but also whether this increase in an apparently recalcitrant disease may be attributed to increased antifungal resistance, more specialist treatment options, or increased attention to dermatomycoses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.