Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36675787›Full record

ArticleJournal of personalized medicine2023

Recognition of Postoperative Cystography Features by Artificial Intelligence to Predict Recovery from Postprostatectomy Urinary Incontinence: A Rapid and Easy Way to Predict Functional Outcome.

I-Hung Shao, Hung-Cheng Kan, Hung-Yi Chen, Ying-Hsu Chang, Liang-Kang Huang, Yuan-Cheng Chu, Po-Hung Lin, Kai-Jie Yu, Cheng-Keng Chuang, See-Tong Pang and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of personalized medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

I-Hung ShaoDivision of Urology, Department of Surgery, Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan 333005, Taiwan.
Hung-Cheng KanDivision of Urology, Department of Surgery, Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan 333005, Taiwan.
Hung-Yi ChenDepartment of Urology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Keelung, Keelung 204201, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0002-3642-4687
Ying-Hsu ChangCollege of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan 333323, Taiwan.
Liang-Kang HuangDivision of Urology, Department of Surgery, Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan 333005, Taiwan.
Yuan-Cheng ChuDivision of Urology, Department of Surgery, Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan 333005, Taiwan.
Po-Hung LinDivision of Urology, Department of Surgery, Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan 333005, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0001-8245-4302
Kai-Jie YuDivision of Urology, Department of Surgery, Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan 333005, Taiwan.
Cheng-Keng ChuangDivision of Urology, Department of Surgery, Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan 333005, Taiwan.
See-Tong PangDivision of Urology, Department of Surgery, Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan 333005, Taiwan.
Chun-Te WuDivision of Urology, Department of Surgery, Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan 333005, Taiwan.
Chang Gung University · TWKeelung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital · TW

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Post-operative cystography has been used to predict the recovery of postprostatectomy urinary incontinence (PPI) in patients with localized prostate cancer. This study aimed to validate the predictive value of cystography for PPI and utilize a deep learning model to identify favorable and unfavorable features. Methods: Medical records and cystography images of patients who underwent robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy for localized prostate cancer were retrospectively reviewed. Specific cystography features, including anastomosis leakage, a downward bladder neck (BN), and the bladder neck angle, were analyzed for the prediction of PPI recovery. Favorable and unfavorable patterns were categorized based on the three cystography features. The deep learning model used for transfer learning was ResNet 50 and weights were trained on ImageNet. We used 5-fold cross-validation to reduce bias. After each fold, we used a test set to confirm the model’s performance. Result: A total of 170 consecutive patients were included; 31.2% experienced immediate urinary continence after surgery, while 93.5% achieved a pad-free status and 6.5% were still incontinent in the 24 weeks after surgery. We divided patients into a fast recovery group (≤4 weeks) and a slow recovery group (>4 weeks). Compared with the slow recovery group, the fast recovery group had a significantly lower anastomosis leakage rate, less of a downward bladder neck, and a larger bladder neck angle. Test data used to evaluate the model’s performance demonstrated an average 5-fold accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of 93.75%, 87.5%, and 100%, respectively. Conclusions: Postoperative cystography features can predict PPI recovery in patients with localized prostate cancer. A deep-learning model can facilitate the identification process. Further validation and exploration are required for the future development of artificial intelligence (AI) in this field.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencecystographydeep learningpostprostatectomy incontinenceradical prostatectomyurinary incontinence

Identifiers

PMID36675787
PMCPMC9866610
OpenAlexW4313823882

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.