ArticleJournal of personalized medicine2023
Clinical Relevance of a Vancomycin 24 h Area under the Concentration-Time Curve Values Using Different Renal Function Equations in Bayesian Dosing Software.
Article in Journal of personalized medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Optimizing Initial Vancomycin Dosing in Hospitalized Patients Using Machine Learning Approach for Enhanced Therapeutic Outcomes: Algorithm Development and Validation Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Article
- Interinstitutional Comparison of Vancomycin Area Under the Concentration-Time Curve Estimation in Korea: Need for Standardized Operational Protocols for Therapeutic Drug Monitoring Consultation.Annals of laboratory medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
With the updated 2020 vancomycin therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) guidelines suggesting a ratio of area under the curve over 24 h to a minimum inhibitory concentration (AUC24/MIC) as a target from the Infectious Diseases Society of America, an accurate estimation of AUC24 has become more critical. We aim to compare the AUC24 using Bayesian dosing software according to various estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) equations in order to analyze the clinical impact of eGFR in vancomycin TDM. We reviewed the TDM dataset of 214 adult patients and analyzed the AUC24 values from various renal function equations, including the Cockcroft-Gault (C-G), the modification of diet in renal disease (MDRD), the chronic kidney disease epidemiology collaboration (CKD-EPI), and the revised Lund−Malmö. The AUC24/MIC results (assuming a MIC of 1 mg/L) were divided into three groups as follows: <400, 400−600, and >600. Additionally, we compared the group agreement between the C-G and the three eGFR formulas. Although there was a statistically significant difference in the AUC24 of the MDRD and the CKD-EPI formulas compared to the C-G, the group concordance rate of the eGFR formula was 95.2−100%, which indicates no clinical significance. The clinical impact of the eGFR formula type on drug dosing recommendations in vancomycin TDM using Bayesian software was insignificant in clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.