Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36675768›Full record

ArticleJournal of personalized medicine2023

Physiological Regulation of Pulmonary Microcirculation under Mechanical Ventilation at Different Cardiac Outputs and Positive End-Expiratory Pressures in a Porcine Model.

Pan Pan, Lina Li, Fei Xie, Xingshuo Hu, Yinghua Guo, Lixin Xie, Longxiang Su

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of personalized medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Pan PanCollege of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100089, China.
Lina LiCollege of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100089, China.
Fei XieCollege of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100089, China.
Xingshuo HuCollege of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100089, China.
Yinghua GuoCollege of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100089, China.
Lixin XieCollege of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100089, China.ORCID 0000-0002-1091-2041
Longxiang SuDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, 1st Shuaifuyuan, Dongcheng District, Beijing 100730, China.
Chinese PLA General Hospital · CNChinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College · CN

Funding

Beijing Nova Program from the Beijing Municipal Science Z201100006820126China Postdoctoral Science Foundation 2021T140794National Science Foundation for Young Scientists of China 81901935Young Elite Scientist Sponsorship Program by Bast BYESS2022035
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study was performed to visualize the hemodynamic effects of pulmonary microcirculation and ventilation/perfusion (V/Q) matching after mechanical ventilation under different cardiac outputs and positive end-expiratory pressures (PEEPs). Ten experimental pigs were randomly divided into high and low tidal volume groups, and ventilation/perfusion were measured by electrical impedance tomography (EIT) at different PEEPs. Then, all the pigs were redivided into high cardiac output (CO) and low CO groups and measured by EIT at different PEEP levels with a low tidal volume. Additionally, sidestream dark field (SDF) was used to measure pulmonary microcirculation. Hemodynamic parameters and respiratory mechanics parameters were recorded. As PEEP increased at high tidal volume, blood flow was impaired at a higher PEEP (20 cmH2O) compared with low tidal volume (shunt: 30.01 ± 0.69% vs. 17.95 ± 0.72%; V/Q ratio: 65.12 ± 1.97% vs. 76.57 ± 1.25%, p < 0.01). Low tidal volume combined with an appropriate PEEP is the best option from the match between ventilation and pulmonary blood flow. Increasing PEEP can solve the problem of excessive shunt at high CO, and the V/Q ratio tends to match. At low CO, the increased dead space can reach as high as 64.64 ± 7.13% when PEEP = 20 cmH2O. With increasing PEEP, the microcirculation index deteriorates, including total vessel density (TVD), proportion of perfused vessel (PPV), perfused vessel density (PVD), and microcirculatory flow index (MFI). The periodic collapse of pulmonary capillaries or interruption of blood flow obviously occurred with high PEEP. The hemodynamic parameters indicated that the transpulmonary capillary wall pressure (Pcap) of the low CO group was negative at PEEP = 5 cmH2O, which determines the opening and closing of the pulmonary microcirculation and controls lung perfusion and the production of extravascular lung water. Therefore, it is essential to couple macrocirculation and pulmonary microcirculation during mechanical ventilation by improving shunting and optimizing Pcap.

Indexed as

mechanical ventilationPEEPpulmonary microcirculationshunttranspulmonary capillary wall pressure (Pcap)

Identifiers

PMID36675768
PMCPMC9861575
OpenAlexW4313582803

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.