Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36675753›Full record

ArticleJournal of personalized medicine2022

Effects of Using Barbed Suture in Myomectomy on Adhesion Formation and Adverse Pregnancy Outcome.

Seyeon Won, Su Hyeon Choi, Nara Lee, So Hyun Shim, Mi Kyoung Kim, Mi-La Kim, Yong Wook Jung, Bo Seong Yun, Seok Ju Seong

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of personalized medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Effectiveness of pharmacological and non-pharmacological therapy on pain intensity and disability in older people with chronic nonspecific low back pain: a systematic review with meta-analysis.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2023
    Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Seyeon WonDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, CHA Gangnam Medical Center, CHA University School of Medicine, Seoul 06135, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-2254-2703
Su Hyeon ChoiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, CHA Gangnam Medical Center, CHA University School of Medicine, Seoul 06135, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-1433-2690
Nara LeeDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, CHA Gangnam Medical Center, CHA University School of Medicine, Seoul 06135, Republic of Korea.
So Hyun ShimDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, CHA Gangnam Medical Center, CHA University School of Medicine, Seoul 06135, Republic of Korea.
Mi Kyoung KimDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, CHA Gangnam Medical Center, CHA University School of Medicine, Seoul 06135, Republic of Korea.
Mi-La KimDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, CHA Gangnam Medical Center, CHA University School of Medicine, Seoul 06135, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-1011-5664
Yong Wook JungDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, CHA Gangnam Medical Center, CHA University School of Medicine, Seoul 06135, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-2098-8143
Bo Seong YunDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, CHA Ilsan Medical Center, CHA University School of Medicine, Goyang 10414, Republic of Korea.
Seok Ju SeongDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, CHA Gangnam Medical Center, CHA University School of Medicine, Seoul 06135, Republic of Korea.
CHA University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: There is still concern regarding postoperative adhesion formation and adverse effects on pregnancy outcomes caused by barbed suture (BS) after myomectomy. The aim of this study was to compare the postoperative adhesion and pregnancy outcomes between conventional suture (CS) and BS after minimally invasive myomectomy (MIM) by robotic myomectomy (RM) or laparoscopic myomectomy (LM). Methods: The medical records of 94 women who had undergone MIM with CS and 97 who had undergone MIM with BS and achieved pregnancy were reviewed. Postoperative adhesion was evaluated following cesarean section. Results: The number of removed myomas was greater (5.3 ± 4.6 vs. 3.5 ± 3.1, p = 0.001) and the size of the largest myoma was larger (7.0 ± 2.2 vs. 5.8 ± 2.7 cm, p = 0.001) in the BS group relative to the CS group. A total of 98.9% of patients in the CS group and 45.4% in the BS group had undergone LM (p < 0.001), while the others underwent RM. There was no significant difference in the presence of postoperative adhesion at cesarean section between the BS and CS groups (45.5 vs. 43.7%, p = 0.095). Additionally, there were no intergroup differences in pregnancy complications such as preterm labor, placenta previa, accrete or abruption. Note also that in our logistic regression analysis, the suture type (BS or CS) was excluded from the independent risk factors regarding postoperative adhesion formation. Conclusions: Our data indicated that the incidence of postoperative adhesion after MIM with BS was similar when compared with CS. Also it seems that the suture type does not have a significant effect on pregnancy outcomes.

Indexed as

laparoscopyrobotic surgical proceduresuterine fibroidsuterine myomectomy

Identifiers

PMID36675753
PMCPMC9862078
OpenAlexW4313316807

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.