ArticleJournal of personalized medicine2022
Assessment of Two Commercial Comprehensive Gene Panels for Personalized Cancer Treatment.
Article in Journal of personalized medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Pathologic and radiologic response to neoadjuvant therapy in advanced differentiated thyroid cancer.European thyroid journal · 2026Article
- Real-World Genomic Landscape of Korean Gastric Cancer: Integrating Biomarker Associations and Clinical Outcomes in Metastatic Gastric Cancer.JCO precision oncology · 2026Article
- Integration of Whole-Genome Sequencing Analysis with Unique Patient-Derived Models Reveals Clinically Relevant Drug Targets in TFCP2 Fusion-Defined Rhabdomyosarcoma.Molecular cancer therapeutics · 2025Article
- Comparison of next‑generation sequencing quality metrics and concordance in the detection of cancer‑specific molecular alterations between formalin‑fixed paraffin‑embedded and fresh‑frozen samples in comprehensive genomic profiling with the Illumina® TruSight Oncology 500 assay.Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2025Article
- Multicenter In-House Evaluation of an Amplicon-Based Next-Generation Sequencing Panel for Comprehensive Molecular Profiling.Molecular diagnosis & therapy · 2025Article
- Performance Characteristics of Oncomine Focus Assay for Theranostic Analysis of Solid Tumors, A (21-Months) Real-Life Study.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Current research status of tumor cell biomarker detection.Microsystems & nanoengineering · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
(1) Background: Analysis of tumor DNA by next-generation sequencing (NGS) plays various roles in the classification and management of cancer. This study aimed to assess the performance of two similar and large, comprehensive gene panels with a focus on clinically relevant variant detection and tumor mutation burden (TMB) assessment; (2) Methods: DNA from 19 diagnostic small cell lung cancer biopsies and an AcroMetrix™ assessment sample with >500 mutations were sequenced using Oncomine™ Comprehensive Assay Plus (OCAP) on the Ion Torrent platform and TruSight Oncology 500 Assay (TSO500) on the Illumina platform; (3) Results: OCAP and TSO500 achieved comparable NGS quality, such as mean read coverage and mean coverage uniformity. A total of 100% of the variants in the diagnostic samples and 80% of the variants in the AcroMetrix™ assessment sample were detected by both panels, and the panels reported highly similar variant allele frequency. A proportion of 14/19 (74%) samples were classified in the same TMB category; (4) Conclusions: Comparable results were obtained using OCAP and TSO500, suggesting that both panels could be applied to screen patients for enrolment in personalized cancer treatment trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.