Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36675618›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2023

Comprehensive Assessment of Corvis ST Biomechanical Indices in Normal and Keratoconus Corneas with Reference to Corneal Enantiomorphism.

Vincent Borderie, Juliette Beauruel, Roxane Cuyaubère, Cristina Georgeon, Benjamin Memmi, Otman Sandali

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Observational
  3. CorvisThe British journal of ophthalmology · 2026
    Article
  4. A Novel Approach to Fabricate Early Keratoconus Phantom Models.Translational vision science & technology · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Vincent BorderieGRC 32, Transplantation et Thérapies Innovantes de la Cornée, Centre Hospitalier National d'Ophtalmologie des Quinze-Vingts, Sorbonne Université, 75006 Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0002-1395-8483
Juliette BeauruelGRC 32, Transplantation et Thérapies Innovantes de la Cornée, Centre Hospitalier National d'Ophtalmologie des Quinze-Vingts, Sorbonne Université, 75006 Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0001-5932-3689
Roxane CuyaubèreGRC 32, Transplantation et Thérapies Innovantes de la Cornée, Centre Hospitalier National d'Ophtalmologie des Quinze-Vingts, Sorbonne Université, 75006 Paris, France.
Cristina GeorgeonGRC 32, Transplantation et Thérapies Innovantes de la Cornée, Centre Hospitalier National d'Ophtalmologie des Quinze-Vingts, Sorbonne Université, 75006 Paris, France.
Benjamin MemmiGRC 32, Transplantation et Thérapies Innovantes de la Cornée, Centre Hospitalier National d'Ophtalmologie des Quinze-Vingts, Sorbonne Université, 75006 Paris, France.
Otman SandaliGRC 32, Transplantation et Thérapies Innovantes de la Cornée, Centre Hospitalier National d'Ophtalmologie des Quinze-Vingts, Sorbonne Université, 75006 Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0001-9133-5786

Funding

Agence Nationale de la Recherche ANR-21-CE19- 0010-02
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this study was to assess Corvis ST biomechanical indices in reference to corneal enantiomorphism. In a prospective observational cohort study, 117 eyes from 63 patients with normal or keratoconus corneas were assessed by three independent observers. In the control group (n = 62), no significant differences were observed between the three observers for all indices. The best reproducibility was obtained with pachymetry and the weakest with CBI. All indices but CBI and arc length featured COV < 10%. All indices except the PD and SSI correlated with pachymetry; all but Rad correlated with IOP. The comparison of the thinnest with the thickest corneas showed no significant differences for any index except pachymetry. In the keratoconus group (n = 55), loss of corneal enantiomorphism was confirmed for all indices except the arc length, velocity, and PD. Significant differences between both groups were found for all indices, even after adjustment for pachymetry and intraocular pressure. The CBI featured the best accuracy (92%), sensitivity (91%), and graphical relevance for keratoconus diagnosis. However, its reproducibility was weak in normal corneas and was strongly dependent on corneal thickness. The SSI was independent of corneal thickness, highly reproducible, and provided the expected enantiomorphism characteristics in both groups, making it a relevant biomarker of biomechanical corneal behavior.

Indexed as

biomechanicscorneaenantiomorphismkeratoconus

Identifiers

PMID36675618
PMCPMC9863401

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.