Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36675599›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2023

Prevalence of and Risk Factors for Adhesive Capsulitis of the Shoulder in Older Adults from Germany.

Louis Jacob, Razak M Gyasi, Ai Koyanagi, Josep Maria Haro, Lee Smith, Karel Kostev

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
9.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07724613 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Comparative Effects of Gongs and Maitland Mobilization on Pain, Range of Motion, and Functional Disability in Patients With Adhesive Capsulitis

TypeinterventionalSponsorRiphah International UniversityRan2026 to 2026Enrolled52ConditionsAdhesive CapsulitisArmsGroup A: Gong's Mobilization, Maitland Mobilization
NCT07724691 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Effects of Spinal Mobilization With Arm Movement and Kaltenborn Mobilization on Pain, Range of Motion, Functional Reaching, and Disability in Adhesive Capsulitis

TypeinterventionalSponsorRiphah International UniversityRan2026 to 2026Enrolled50ConditionsAdhesive Capsulitis, Frozen Shoulder, Mulligan Mobilization, Spinal MobilizationArmsSpinal Mobilization with Arm Movement, Kaltenborn Mobilization
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. The diagnostic value of physical examination tests in adhesive capsulitis: a systematic review.European journal of physical and rehabilitation medicine · 2023
    Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Shoulder and genetics: what orthopedic surgeons need to know.JSES reviews, reports, and techniques · 2026
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 5 countries.

Louis JacobResearch and Development Unit, Parc Sanitari Sant Joan de Déu, CIBERSAM, ISCIII, Dr. Antoni Pujadas, 42, Sant Boi de Llobregat, 08830 Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-1071-1239
Razak M GyasiAfrican Population and Health Research Center, Nairobi 00100, Kenya.ORCID 0000-0002-6733-1539
Ai KoyanagiResearch and Development Unit, Parc Sanitari Sant Joan de Déu, CIBERSAM, ISCIII, Dr. Antoni Pujadas, 42, Sant Boi de Llobregat, 08830 Barcelona, Spain.
Josep Maria HaroResearch and Development Unit, Parc Sanitari Sant Joan de Déu, CIBERSAM, ISCIII, Dr. Antoni Pujadas, 42, Sant Boi de Llobregat, 08830 Barcelona, Spain.
Lee SmithCentre for Health, Performance and Wellbeing, Anglia Ruskin University, Cambridge CB1 1PT, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5340-9833
Karel KostevEpidemiology, IQVIA, 60549 Frankfurt, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-2124-7227
African Population and Health Research Center · KEAnglia Ruskin University · GBInstitució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avançats · ESInstituto de Salud Carlos III · ESUniversité Paris Cité · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aimed to investigate the prevalence of and risk factors for adhesive capsulitis in older adults from Germany. The one-year and lifetime prevalence of adhesive capsulitis were assessed in adults aged ≥65 years with at least one visit to one of 1207 general practices in Germany in 2021. Associations between physical and psychiatric conditions and adhesive capsulitis were further assessed in older patients diagnosed for the first time with adhesive capsulitis in general practices in 2010-2021 (index date) and matched (1:5) to patients without adhesive capsulitis using a propensity score based on age, sex, and the index year. In adults without adhesive capsulitis, the index date was a randomly selected visit date in 2010-2021. The one-year and lifetime prevalence of adhesive capsulitis in older adults in 2021 were 0.4% and 2.4%, respectively. In 8439 patients with and 42,195 patients without adhesive capsulitis, 12 conditions were positively and significantly associated with adhesive capsulitis. Effect sizes were strongest for other and unspecified osteoarthritis (OR = 1.93), injury to the shoulder and upper arm (OR = 1.85), and injury to the thorax (OR = 1.47). Based on these findings, adhesive capsulitis can occur at older age, and osteoarthritis and injuries are major risk factors.

Indexed as

adhesive capsulitisepidemiologyfrozen shoulderGermanyolder adults

Identifiers

PMID36675599
PMCPMC9866675
OpenAlexW4316467313

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.