Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36675510›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2023

The Effect of PRP Augmentation of Arthroscopic Repairs of Shoulder Rotator Cuff Tears on Postoperative Clinical Scores and Retear Rates: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Ioannis Angelos Trantos, Elias S Vasiliadis, Filippos S Giannoulis, Eleni Pappa, Fotios Kakridonis, Spyros G Pneumaticos

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07659600 (Performance of Autologous Platelet-rich Plasma Injection for Tendon Regeneration in Partial Supraspinatus Tears), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07659600 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Performance of Autologous Platelet-rich Plasma Injection for Tendon Regeneration in Partial Supraspinatus Tears

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversidade Nova de LisboaRan2026 to 2029Enrolled100ConditionsPartial Supraspinatus Tear, Rotator Cuff Tears (RCTs), Rotator Cuff InjuryArmsPlatelet-Rich Plasma (PRP) Injections
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ioannis Angelos Trantos5th Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, KAT Hospital, 14561 Athens, Greece.ORCID 0000-0003-0484-4676
Elias S Vasiliadis3rd Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, KAT Hospital, University of Athens, 14561 Athens, Greece.ORCID 0000-0003-2428-5250
Filippos S GiannoulisHand, Upper Extremity and Microsurgery Department, KAT Hospital, 14561 Athens, Greece.
Eleni Pappa5th Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, KAT Hospital, 14561 Athens, Greece.
Fotios Kakridonis5th Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, KAT Hospital, 14561 Athens, Greece.
Spyros G Pneumaticos3rd Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, KAT Hospital, University of Athens, 14561 Athens, Greece.
KAT General Hospital of Attica · GRNational and Kapodistrian University of Athens · GR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this review and meta-analysis is to assess recent clinical trials concerning the combination of operative treatment of rotator cuff tears and the administration of PRP and its effect on clinical scores and postoperative retear rates. The trials were used to compare the combination of PRP treatment and arthroscopic rotator cuff repair to arthroscopy alone. Twenty-five clinical trials were reviewed. A risk-of-bias assessment was made for all randomized clinical trials included, using the Cochrane collaboration’s tool as well as a quality assessment for all non-randomized studies utilizing the Newcastle−Ottawa scale. The PRP-treated patients showed statistically significant improvement postoperatively compared to control groups concerning the Constant−Murley (mean difference 2.46, 95% CI 1.4−3.52, p < 0.00001), SST (mean difference 0.32, 95% CI 0.02−0.63, p = 0.04), and UCLA (mean difference 0.82, 95% CI 0.23−1.43, p = 0.07) scores. A statistically significant decrease of retear rates in the PRP-treated patients, with a risk ratio of 0.78 (95% CI 0.65−0.94, p = 0.01), was found. We believe that the results presented have positive aspects, especially concerning the retear risk, but are yet inconclusive concerning clinical results such as shoulder pain and function.

Indexed as

arthroscopygrowth factorsplatelet-rich fibrinplatelet-rich plasmarotator cuff tearsshoulder injuries

Identifiers

PMID36675510
PMCPMC9860857
OpenAlexW4315647254

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.