Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36675481›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2023

Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Malignant Melanoma of the Head and Neck: A Single Center Experience.

Marco Rubatto, Franco Picciotto, Giovenale Moirano, Enrico Fruttero, Virginia Caliendo, Silvia Borriello, Nadia Sciamarrelli, Paolo Fava, Rebecca Senetta, Adriana Lesca and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Marco RubattoSection of Dermatology, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, Via Cherasco 23, 10121 Turin, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1706-656X
Franco PicciottoDermatologic Surgery Section, Department of Surgery, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria (AOU) Città della Salute e della Scienza, 10126 Turin, Italy.
Giovenale MoiranoDepartment of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, 10121 Turin, Italy.
Enrico FrutteroDermatologic Surgery Section, Department of Surgery, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria (AOU) Città della Salute e della Scienza, 10126 Turin, Italy.
Virginia CaliendoDermatologic Surgery Section, Department of Surgery, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria (AOU) Città della Salute e della Scienza, 10126 Turin, Italy.
Silvia BorrielloSection of Dermatology, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, Via Cherasco 23, 10121 Turin, Italy.
Nadia SciamarrelliSection of Dermatology, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, Via Cherasco 23, 10121 Turin, Italy.
Paolo FavaSection of Dermatology, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, Via Cherasco 23, 10121 Turin, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-8443-7458
Rebecca SenettaPathology Unit, Department of Oncology, University of Turin, 10121 Turin, Italy.
Adriana LescaDepartment of Medical Science, Division of Nuclear Medicine, University of Turin, 10126 Turin, Italy.
Anna SapinoDepartment of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, 10121 Turin, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-3542-9571
Désirée DeandreisDepartment of Medical Science, Division of Nuclear Medicine, University of Turin, 10126 Turin, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-3817-6648
Simone RiberoSection of Dermatology, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, Via Cherasco 23, 10121 Turin, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-0098-1406
Pietro QuaglinoSection of Dermatology, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, Via Cherasco 23, 10121 Turin, Italy.
University of Turin · ITAzienda Ospedaliera Citta' della Salute e della Scienza di Torino · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: This study evaluated the characteristics of patients with head and neck (H&N) melanoma who underwent sentinel lymph node biopsy (SNLB) and assessed the clinical course of patients categorizing subjects according to SLNB status and melanoma location (scalp area vs. non-scalp areas). Methods: Patients undergoing SLNB for melanoma of H&N from 2015 to 2021 were prospectively characterized according to sentinel lymph node (SLN) status. SPECT/CT had been previously performed. Patients were followed until the first adverse event to evaluate progression-free survival. Results: 93 patients were enrolled. SLNB was negative in 75 patients. The median Breslow index was higher for patients with positive SLNB compared with patients with negative SLNB. In addition, the Breslow index was higher for melanoma of the scalp compared with non-scalp melanoma. The median follow-up was 24.8 months. Progression occurred at the systemic level in the 62.5% of cases. There was a significant association between positive SLNB and progression (p-value < 0.01) of disease, with lower progression-free survival for patients with melanoma of the scalp compared with those with melanoma at other anatomic sites (p-value: 0.15). Conclusions: Scalp melanomas are more aggressive than other types of H&N melanomas. Sentinel lymph node status is the strongest prognostic criterion for recurrence.

Indexed as

head and neckhead and neck melanomamelanomasentinelSLNSPECT/CT

Identifiers

PMID36675481
PMCPMC9864837
OpenAlexW4315485595

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.