ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2023
Relevance of Visual Acuity Measurement for Therapeutic Decisions in Age-Related Macular Degeneration.
Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Relevance of Visual Acuity Measurement for Therapeutic Decisions in Diabetic Macular Edema.Pharmaceutics · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of this study is to assess if the decision to retreat could be determined by anatomical criteria (mostly driven by optical coherence tomography (OCT)-guided strategy) rather than the gold standard (visual acuity (VA) and OCT) in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD). A cross-sectional study of 142 eyes already treated for nAMD from September 2021 to December 2021 was performed. At inclusion, a first therapeutic decision was made based on the analysis of the OCT. This decision was then maintained or modified after being made aware of the patient's VA. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) were calculated. The OCT-guided strategy matched the gold standard for treatment decisions in 131 of the 142 eyes included (92.3%). The sensitivity and specificity of the OCT-guided strategy for the retreatment decision were 94.0% and 89.8%, respectively. PPV and NPV were 92.9% and 91.4%, respectively. Considering the treatment regimen, eyes followed under the Pro ReNata regimen showed better sensitivity (100%) and specificity (93.3%) than eyes followed under the treat and extend regimen (93.5% and 88.6%, respectively). Based on the findings of this study, the follow-up for selected patients with nAMD under anti-VEGF treatment could be monitored without regular VA testing with acceptable performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.