Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36675417›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2023

Immediate vs. Delayed Placement of Immediately Provisionalized Self-Tapping Implants: A Non-Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial with 1 Year of Follow-Up.

Paolo Carosi, Claudia Lorenzi, Riccardo Di Gianfilippo, Piero Papi, Andrea Laureti, Hom-Lay Wang, Claudio Arcuri

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Paolo CarosiDepartment of Chemical Science and Technologies, PhD in Materials for Health, Environment and Energy-Dentistry, University of Rome Tor Vergata, 00133 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-2442-1091
Claudia LorenziDepartment of Chemical Science and Technologies, PhD in Materials for Health, Environment and Energy-Dentistry, University of Rome Tor Vergata, 00133 Rome, Italy.
Riccardo Di GianfilippoDepartment of Periodontics and Oral Medicine, School of Dentistry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.
Piero PapiDepartment of Oral and Maxillo-Facial Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2564-530X
Andrea LauretiDepartment of Chemical Science and Technologies, PhD in Materials for Health, Environment and Energy-Dentistry, University of Rome Tor Vergata, 00133 Rome, Italy.
Hom-Lay WangDepartment of Periodontics and Oral Medicine, School of Dentistry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.
Claudio ArcuriDepartment of Clinical Sciences and Translational Medicine, School of Dentistry, University of Tor Vergata, 00133 Rome, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aimed to examine the clinical and esthetic outcomes of immediately provisionalized self-tapping implants placed in extraction sockets or healed edentulous ridges one year after treatment. Sixty patients in need of a single implant-supported restoration were treated with self-tapping implants (Straumann BLX) and immediate provisionalization. The implant stability quotient (ISQ) and insertion torque were recorded intraoperatively. After one year in function, the implant and prosthesis survival rate, pink esthetic score (PES), white esthetic score (WES), and marginal bone levels (MBL) were assessed. Sixty patients received 60 self-tapping implants. A total of 37 implants were placed in extraction sockets and 23 in edentulous ridges, and then all implants were immediately provisionalized. All implants achieved a high implant stability with a mean insertion torque and ISQ value of 58.1 ± 14.1 Ncm and 73.6 ± 8.1 Ncm, respectively. No significant differences were found between healed vs. post-extractive sockets (

Indexed as

computer-guided surgeryimmediate loadingimmediate placementimmediate temporizationprimary stabilitysingle implant

Identifiers

PMID36675417
PMCPMC9861545

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.