Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36675292›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2023

In Vivo Biofilm Formation on Novel PEEK, Titanium, and Zirconia Implant Abutment Materials.

Andreas Wiessner, Torsten Wassmann, Johanna Maria Wiessner, Andrea Schubert, Bernhard Wiechens, Tristan Hampe, Ralf Bürgers

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
8.7field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. ROS-responsive HBioactive materials · 2027
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Andreas WiessnerDepartment of Prosthodontics, University Medical Center Göttingen, 37075 Göttingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-8333-1387
Torsten WassmannDepartment of Prosthodontics, University Medical Center Göttingen, 37075 Göttingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-7041-8774
Johanna Maria WiessnerDepartment of Orthodontics, University Medical Center Göttingen, 37075 Göttingen, Germany.
Andrea SchubertDepartment of Prosthodontics, University Medical Center Göttingen, 37075 Göttingen, Germany.
Bernhard WiechensDepartment of Orthodontics, University Medical Center Göttingen, 37075 Göttingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-2323-5940
Tristan HampeDepartment of Prosthodontics, University Medical Center Göttingen, 37075 Göttingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-4569-3085
Ralf BürgersDepartment of Prosthodontics, University Medical Center Göttingen, 37075 Göttingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6320-4348
Universitätsmedizin Göttingen · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The formation of biofilms on the surface of dental implants and abutment materials may lead to peri-implantitis and subsequent implant failure. Recently, innovative materials such as polyether-ether-ketone (PEEK) and its modifications have been used as abutment materials. However, there is limited knowledge on microbial adhesion to PEEK materials. The aim of this in vivo study was to investigate biofilm formation on the surface of conventional (titanium and zirconia) and PEEK implant abutment materials. Split specimens of titanium, zirconia, PEEK, and modified PEEK (PEEK-BioHPP) were manufactured, mounted in individual removable acrylic upper jaw splints, and worn by 20 healthy volunteers for 24 h. The surface roughness was determined using widefield confocal microscopy. Biofilm accumulation was investigated by fluorescence microscopy and quantified by imaging software. The surface roughness of the investigated materials was <0.2 µm and showed no significant differences between the materials. Zirconia showed the lowest biofilm formation, followed by titanium, PEEK, and PEEK-BioHPP. Differences were significant (p < 0.001) between the investigated materials, except for the polyether-ether-ketones. Generally, biofilm formation was significantly higher (p < 0.05) in the posterior region of the oral cavity than in the anterior region. The results of the present study show a material-dependent susceptibility to biofilm formation. The risk of developing peri-implantitis may be reduced by a specific choice of abutment material.

Indexed as

Dental ImplantsPeri-ImplantitisBenzophenonesBiofilmsDental MaterialsHumansKetonesMaterials TestingPolyethylene GlycolsPolymersTitaniumZirconiumBenzophenonesDental ImplantsDental MaterialsKetonespolyetheretherketonePolyethylene GlycolsPolymersTitaniumZirconiumzirconium oxidebiofilmbiofilm managementdental biomaterialimplant abutmentin vivo studyPEEKperi-implantitistitaniumzirconia

Identifiers

PMID36675292
PMCPMC9865206
OpenAlexW4316468618

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.