ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2023
Prioritization of New Candidate Genes for Rare Genetic Diseases by a Disease-Aware Evaluation of Heterogeneous Molecular Networks.
Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- A global survey of systems biology-based predictions of gene-rare disease associations to enhance new diagnoses.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Prolonged survival in a patient with pbrm1 mutated metastatic cholangiocarcinoma receiving tazemetostat.NPJ precision oncology · 2025Article
- Resources and tools for rare disease variant interpretation.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Screening for pathogenic variants in the diagnosis of rare genetic diseases can now be performed on all genes thanks to the application of whole exome and genome sequencing (WES, WGS). Yet the repertoire of gene-disease associations is not complete. Several computer-based algorithms and databases integrate distinct gene-gene functional networks to accelerate the discovery of gene-disease associations. We hypothesize that the ability of every type of information to extract relevant insights is disease-dependent. We compiled 33 functional networks classified into 13 knowledge categories (KCs) and observed large variability in their ability to recover genes associated with 91 genetic diseases, as measured using efficiency and exclusivity. We developed GLOWgenes, a network-based algorithm that applies random walk with restart to evaluate KCs' ability to recover genes from a given list associated with a phenotype and modulates the prediction of new candidates accordingly. Comparison with other integration strategies and tools shows that our disease-aware approach can boost the discovery of new gene-disease associations, especially for the less obvious ones. KC contribution also varies if obtained using recently discovered genes. Applied to 15 unsolved WES, GLOWgenes proposed three new genes to be involved in the phenotypes of patients with syndromic inherited retinal dystrophies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.