Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36675109›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2023

Comparative Evaluation of Reproducibility of Phage-Displayed Peptide Selections and NGS Data, through High-Fidelity Mapping of Massive Peptide Repertoires.

Klaus G Petry, Eleftherios Pilalis, Aristotelis Chatziioannou

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Advances in Antibody Design and Antigenic Peptide Targeting 2.0.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Klaus G PetryINSERM U1029 Tumor Microenvironment and INSERM U1049 Neuroinflammation, Bordeaux University, 33000 Bordeaux, France.ORCID 0000-0002-9527-6098
Eleftherios PilalisEnios Applications P.C., Kallithea, 17671 Athens, Greece.ORCID 0000-0002-5253-5256
Aristotelis ChatziioannouEnios Applications P.C., Kallithea, 17671 Athens, Greece.ORCID 0000-0003-2078-0844
Biomedical Research Foundation of the Academy of Athens · GRCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FR

Funding

General Secretariat for Research and Technology MIS: 5129434INSERM ANR-French National Research Agency 2006-15
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Phage-displayed peptide selections generate complex repertoires of several hundred thousand peptides as revealed by next-generation sequencing (NGS). In repeated peptide selections, however, even in identical experimental in vitro conditions, only a very small number of common peptides are found. The repertoire complexities are evidence of the difficulty of distinguishing between effective selections of specific peptide binders to exposed targets and the potential high background noise. Such investigation is even more relevant when considering the plethora of in vivo expressed targets on cells, in organs or in the entire organism to define targeting peptide agents. In the present study, we compare the published NGS data of three peptide repertoires that were obtained by phage display under identical experimental in vitro conditions. By applying the recently developed tool PepSimili we evaluate the calculated similarities of the individual peptides from each of these three repertoires and perform their mappings on the human proteome. The peptide-to-peptide mappings reveal high similarities among the three repertoires, confirming the desired reproducibility of phage-displayed peptide selections.

Indexed as

BacteriophagesPeptide LibraryHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansPeptidesReproducibility of ResultsPeptide LibraryPeptidesbioinformaticsbio-panningNGSpeptidesphage displayprotein domains

Identifiers

PMID36675109
PMCPMC9862337
OpenAlexW4315853504

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.