Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36674848›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2023

Repair of Long Peripheral Nerve Defects in Sheep: A Translational Model for Nerve Regeneration.

Estefanía Contreras, Sara Traserra, Sara Bolívar, Joaquím Forés, Eduard Jose-Cunilleras, Ignacio Delgado-Martínez, Félix García, Esther Udina, Xavier Navarro

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Peripheral nerve repair: innovations and future directions.Journal of translational medicine · 2026
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Estefanía ContrerasInstitute of Neurosciences, Department Cell Biology, Physiology and Immunology, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08193 Bellaterra, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-8645-2790
Sara TraserraInstitute of Neurosciences, Department Cell Biology, Physiology and Immunology, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08193 Bellaterra, Spain.
Sara BolívarInstitute of Neurosciences, Department Cell Biology, Physiology and Immunology, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08193 Bellaterra, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-2966-6845
Joaquím ForésInstitute of Neurosciences, Department Cell Biology, Physiology and Immunology, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08193 Bellaterra, Spain.
Eduard Jose-CunillerasDepartment of Animal Medicine and Surgery, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08193 Bellaterra, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-4536-7717
Ignacio Delgado-MartínezInstitute of Neurosciences, Department Cell Biology, Physiology and Immunology, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08193 Bellaterra, Spain.
Félix GarcíaDepartment of Animal Medicine and Surgery, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08193 Bellaterra, Spain.
Esther UdinaInstitute of Neurosciences, Department Cell Biology, Physiology and Immunology, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08193 Bellaterra, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-1954-8562
Xavier NavarroInstitute of Neurosciences, Department Cell Biology, Physiology and Immunology, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08193 Bellaterra, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-9849-902X
Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona · ES

Funding

Biomedical Research Networking Center on Neurodegenerative Diseases CB06/05/1105EUREKA E10668 eBionerveMinisterio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades of Spain SAF2017-84464RTERAV RICORS RD21/0017/008
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite advances in microsurgery, full functional recovery of severe peripheral nerve injuries is not commonly attained. The sheep appears as a good preclinical model since it presents nerves with similar characteristics to humans. In this study, we induced 5 or 7 cm resection in the peroneal nerve and repaired with an autograft. Functional evaluation was performed monthly. Electromyographic and ultrasound tests were performed at 6.5 and 9 months postoperation (mpo). No significant differences were found between groups with respect to functional tests, although slow improvements were seen from 5 mpo. Electrophysiological tests showed compound muscle action potentials (CMAP) of small amplitude at 6.5 mpo that increased at 9 mpo, although they were significantly lower than the contralateral side. Ultrasound tests showed significantly reduced size of tibialis anterior (TA) muscle at 6.5 mpo and partially recovered size at 9 mpo. Histological evaluation of the grafts showed good axonal regeneration in all except one sheep from autograft 7 cm (AG7) group, while distal to the graft there was a higher number of axons than in control nerves. The results indicate that sheep nerve repair is a useful model for investigating long-gap peripheral nerve injuries.

Indexed as

Peripheral Nerve InjuriesAnimalsAxonsHumansNerve RegenerationPeripheral NervesPeroneal NerveSciatic NerveSheeplarge animal modellong gapnerve injurynerve regenerationsheep

Identifiers

PMID36674848
PMCPMC9863630
OpenAlexW4315497972

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.