Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36674348›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2023

Impact of the Rise of Artificial Intelligence in Radiology: What Do Students Think?

Andrés Barreiro-Ares, Annia Morales-Santiago, Francisco Sendra-Portero, Miguel Souto-Bayarri

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. The Language of Nature and Artificial Intelligence in Patient Care.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Andrés Barreiro-AresDepartment of Radiology, School of Medicine, University of Santiago de Compostela/CHUS/IDIS (Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Santiago), 15782 Santiago de Compostela, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-1238-0429
Annia Morales-SantiagoDepartment of Radiology, School of Medicine, University of Santiago de Compostela/CHUS/IDIS (Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Santiago), 15782 Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
Francisco Sendra-PorteroDepartment of Radiology and Physical Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Malaga, 29010 Málaga, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-9535-9806
Miguel Souto-BayarriDepartment of Radiology, School of Medicine, University of Santiago de Compostela/CHUS/IDIS (Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Santiago), 15782 Santiago de Compostela, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The rise of artificial intelligence (AI) in medicine, and particularly in radiology, is becoming increasingly prominent. Its impact will transform the way the specialty is practiced and the current and future education model. The aim of this study is to analyze the perception that undergraduate medical students have about the current situation of AI in medicine, especially in radiology. A survey with 17 items was distributed to medical students between 3 January to 31 March 2022. Two hundred and eighty-one students correctly responded the questionnaire; 79.3% of them claimed that they knew what AI is. However, their objective knowledge about AI was low but acceptable. Only 24.9% would choose radiology as a specialty, and only 40% of them as one of their first three options. The applications of this technology were valued positively by most students, who give it an important Support Role, without fear that the radiologist will be replaced by AI (79.7%). The majority (95.7%) agreed with the need to implement well-established ethical principles in AI, and 80% valued academic training in AI positively. Surveyed medical students have a basic understanding of AI and perceive it as a useful tool that will transform radiology.

Indexed as

RadiologyStudents, MedicalArtificial IntelligenceHumansRadiographySurveys and Questionnairesartificial intelligencemedical studentsradiology

Identifiers

PMID36674348
PMCPMC9867061

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.