Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36674225›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2023

Reproducibility and Scientific Integrity of Big Data Research in Urban Public Health and Digital Epidemiology: A Call to Action.

Ana Cecilia Quiroga Gutierrez, Daniel J Lindegger, Ala Taji Heravi, Thomas Stojanov, Martin Sykora, Suzanne Elayan, Stephen J Mooney, John A Naslund, Marta Fadda, Oliver Gruebner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. The Role of Social Media in Building Pandemic Resilience in an Urban Community: A Qualitative Case Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Ana Cecilia Quiroga GutierrezDepartment of Health Sciences and Medicine, University of Lucerne, 6002 Luzern, Switzerland.
Daniel J LindeggerInstitute of Global Health, University of Geneva, 1211 Geneva, Switzerland.
Ala Taji HeraviCLEAR Methods Center, Department of Clinical Research, Division of Clinical Epidemiology, University Hospital Basel and University of Basel, 4031 Basel, Switzerland.
Thomas StojanovDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, University Hospital of Basel, 4031 Basel, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-8172-5326
Martin SykoraSchool of Business and Economics, Centre for Information Management, Loughborough University, Loughborough LE11 3TU, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5363-5857
Suzanne ElayanSchool of Business and Economics, Centre for Information Management, Loughborough University, Loughborough LE11 3TU, UK.
Stephen J MooneyDepartment of Epidemiology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA.
John A NaslundDepartment of Global Health and Social Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6777-0104
Marta FaddaInstitute of Public Health, Università Della Svizzera Italiana, 6900 Lugano, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-3537-0346
Oliver GruebnerEpidemiology, Biostatistics and Prevention Institute, University of Zurich, 8001 Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-9783-4770

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The emergence of big data science presents a unique opportunity to improve public-health research practices. Because working with big data is inherently complex, big data research must be clear and transparent to avoid reproducibility issues and positively impact population health. Timely implementation of solution-focused approaches is critical as new data sources and methods take root in public-health research, including urban public health and digital epidemiology. This commentary highlights methodological and analytic approaches that can reduce research waste and improve the reproducibility and replicability of big data research in public health. The recommendations described in this commentary, including a focus on practices, publication norms, and education, are neither exhaustive nor unique to big data, but, nonetheless, implementing them can broadly improve public-health research. Clearly defined and openly shared guidelines will not only improve the quality of current research practices but also initiate change at multiple levels: the individual level, the institutional level, and the international level.

Indexed as

Big DataPublic HealthPublic Health PracticeReproducibility of Resultsbig datadigital epidemiologyreproducibilityurban public health

Identifiers

PMID36674225
PMCPMC9861515

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.